Home > Shakespearean Criticism > The Merchant of Venice (Vol. 77) - Bruce Boehrer (essay date summer 1999)
The Merchant of Venice (Vol. 77) - Bruce Boehrer (essay date summer 1999)
Bruce Boehrer (essay date summer 1999)
SOURCE: Boehrer, Bruce. “Shylock and the Rise of the Household Pet: Thinking Social Exclusion in The Merchant of Venice.” Shakespeare Quarterly 50, no. 2 (summer 1999): 152-70.
[In the following essay, Boehrer studies the play's bestial language and imagery, contending that Shylock's association with a mongrel or cur informs an understanding of his role in The Merchant of Venice, including his position as an outcast and his attitude toward his social standing.]
In 1615, while visiting Cambridge University, King James I attended a public debate between John Preston and Matthew Wren on the question of “whether Dogs could make syllogismes.”1 Wren took the negative and Preston the affirmative, the latter carrying the day in part with the following argument:
an Ethymeme [sic] (said he), is a lawfull & reall syllogisme, but dogs can make them; he...
[The entire page is 10912 words long]
Join eNotes
Over 3,500 study guides, question and answer forums, literature criticism, reference content, and much more!
Navigate
- Introduction
- Criticism: Overviews And General Studies
- Criticism: Character Studies
-
Criticism: Production Reviews
- Peter Marks (review date 13 January 1999)
- Hal Jensen (review date 2 July 1999)
- Matt Wolf (review date 2 August 1999)
- Robert Smallwood (review date 1999)
- John Simon (review date 14 February 2000)
- Alvin Klein (review date 5 November 2000)
- Robert Smallwood (review date 2000)
- Caryn James (review date 8 October 2001)
- Toby Young (review date 10 November 2001)
- Criticism: Themes
- Further Reading
- Copyright
