Home > Shakespearean Criticism > King Lear (Vol. 83) - Jonathan Dollimore (essay date 1984)
King Lear (Vol. 83) - Jonathan Dollimore (essay date 1984)
Jonathan Dollimore (essay date 1984)
SOURCE: Dollimore, Jonathan. βKing Lear and Essentialist Humanism.β In William Shakespeare's King Lear, edited by Harold Bloom, pp. 71-83. New York: Chelsea House Publishers, 1987.
[In the following essay, originally published in 1984, Dollimore argues against Christian and humanist interpretations of King Lear, noting that βthe play concludes with two events [the deaths of Cordelia and Lear] which sabotage the prospect of both closure and recuperation.β]
When he is on the heath King Lear is moved to pity. As unaccommodated man he feels what wretches feel. For the humanist the tragic paradox arises here: debasement gives rise to dignity and at the moment when Lear might be expected to be most brutalised he becomes most human. Through kindness and shared vulnerability humankind redeems itself in a universe where the gods are at best callously just, at worst sadistically...
[The entire page is 5575 words long]
Join eNotes
Over 3,500 study guides, question and answer forums, literature criticism, reference content, and much more!
Navigate
- Introduction
- Criticism: Overviews And General Studies
- Criticism: Character Studies
- Criticism: Production Reviews
-
Criticism: Themes
- Sears Jayne (essay date spring 1964)
- Dean Frye (essay date March 1965)
- Joseph Wittreich (essay date 1984)
- Cherrell Guilfoyle (essay date 1990)
- June Schlueter (essay date 1995)
- Richard Knowles (essay date spring 1999)
- Susan Viguers (essay date March 2000)
- Michael Edwards (essay date autumn 2000)
- Alan Rosen (essay date 2001)
- Further Reading
- Copyright
