Home > Shakespearean Criticism > King John (Vol. 56) - A. R. Braunmuller (essay date 1988)

King John (Vol. 56) - A. R. Braunmuller (essay date 1988)

A. R. Braunmuller (essay date 1988)

SOURCE: “King John and Historiography,” in ELH, Vol. 55, No. 2, Summer, 1988, pp. 309-32.

[In the following essay, Braunmuller compares the accounts of Shakespeare's King John, Holinshed's Chronicles, and Sir John Hayward's writings, to discern Shakespeare's perception and treatment of historiography.]

Meercraft: By my ’faith
you are cunning i’ the Chronicle,
Sir.
Fitzdottrel: No, I confess I ha’t
from the Play-books,
And think they’are more authentic.
Engine: That’s sure, Sir.

—Ben Jonson, The Devil Is an Ass

Thinking about Renaissance English history plays, we typically but wrongly treat the chronicles as sources of a different color. Making Comedy of Errors from Menaechmi, or Measure for Measure from Promos and Cassandra, or a history play from Hall and Holinshed, Foxe and Stowe, are similar creative acts...

[The entire page is 10321 words long]

Join eNotes

The above is a free excerpt. Get total access to this content with the: