King John (Vol. 88) | Copyright Page

ISSN 0883-9123

Volume 88

Criticism of William Shakespeare’s Plays and Poetry, from the First Published Appraisals to Current Evaluations

Michelle Lee

Project Editor

Project Editor

Michelle Lee

Editorial

Jessica Bomarito, Kathy D. Darrow, Jeffrey W. Hunter, Jelena O. Krstovi´c, Julie Landelius, Ellen McGeagh, Linda Pavlovski, Thomas J. Schoenberg, Lawrence J. Trudeau, Russel Whitaker

© 2005 Thomson Gale, a part of The Thomson Corporation. Thomson and Star Logo are trademarks and Gale is a registered trademark used herein under license.

For more information, contact

Thomson Gale 27500 Drake Rd. Farmington Hills, MI 48331-3535 Or you can visit our internet site at http://www.gale.com

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

No part of this work covered by the copyright herein may be reproduced or used in any form or by any means—graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping, Web distribution, or information storage retrieval systems—without the written permission of the publisher.

Shakespearean Criticism, Vol. 88

Data Capture

Francis Monroe, Gwen Tucker

Rights and Acquisitions

Margie Abendroth, Peg Ashlevitz, Lori Hines

Imaging and Multimedia

Robert Duncan, Lezlie Light, Kelly A. Quin

This publication is a creative work fully protected by all applicable copyright laws, as well as by misappropriation, trade secret, unfair competition, and other applicable laws. The authors and editors of this work have added value to the underlying factual material herein through one or more of the following: unique and original selection, coordination, expression, arrangement, and classification of the information.

For permission to use material from the product, submit your request via the Web at http://www.gale-edit.com/permissions, or you may download our Permissions Request form and submit your request by fax or mail to:

Permisssions Department

Thomson Gale 27500 Drake Rd. Farmington Hills, MI 48331-3535 Permissions Hotline: 248-699-8006 or 800-877-4253, ext. 8006 Fax 248-699-8074 or 800-762-4058

Composition and Electronic Prepress

Kathy Sauer

Manufacturing

Rhonda Williams

Product Manager

Janet Witalec

Since this page cannot legibly accommodate all copyright notices, the acknowledgments constitute an extension of the copyright notice.

While every effort has been made to secure permission to reprint material and to ensure the reliability of the information presented in this publication, Thomson Gale neither guarantees the accuracy of the data contained herein nor assumes any responsibility for errors, omissions or discrepancies. Thomson Gale accepts no payment for listing; and inclusion in the publication of any organization, agency, institution, publication, service, or individual does not imply endorsement of the editors or publisher. Errors brought to the attention of the publisher and verified to the satisfaction of the publisher will be corrected in future editions.

LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOG CARD NUMBER 86-645085

ISBN 0-7876-8826-6
ISSN 0883-9123

Printed in the United States of America 10987654321

Preface

S
hakespearean Criticism (SC) provides students, educators, theatergoers, and other interested readers with valuable insight into Shakespeare’s drama and poetry. A multiplicity of viewpoints documenting the critical reaction of scholars and commentators from the seventeenth century to the present day derives from hundreds of periodicals and books excerpted for the series. Students and teachers at all levels of study will benefit from SC, whether they seek information for class discussions and written assignments, new perspectives on traditional issues, or the most noteworthy of analyses of Shakespeare’s artistry.

Scope of the Series

Volumes 1 through 10 of the series present a unique historical overview of the critical response to each Shakespearean work, representing a broad range of interpretations.

Volumes 11 through 26 recount the performance history of Shakespeare’s plays on the stage and screen through eyewitness reviews and retrospective evaluations of individual productions, comparisons of major interpretations, and discussions of staging issues.

Volumes 27 through 56 in the series focus on criticism published after 1960, with a view to providing the reader with the most significant modern critical approaches. Each volume is ordered around a theme that is central to the study of Shakespeare, such as politics, religion, or sexuality. The topic entry that introduces each volume is comprised of general essays that discuss this theme with reference to all of Shakespeare’s works. Following the topic entry are several entries devoted to individual works. Beginning with volume 57 in the series, SC provides a works-based approach; each of the four entries contained in a regular volume focuses on a specific Shakespearean play or poem. The entries will include the most recent criticism available on the works, as well as earlier criticism not previously included in SC. Select volumes contain topic entries comprised of essays that analyze various topics, or themes, found in Shakespeare’s works. Past topic entries have covered such subjects as Honor, Jealousy, War and Warfare, and Elizabethan Politics.

Until volume 48, published in October 1999, SC compiled an annual volume of the most noteworthy essays published on Shakespeare during the previous year. The essays, reprinted in their entirety, were recommended to Thomson Gale by an international panel of distinguished scholars.

Organization of the Book

An SC entry consists of the following elements:

  • © The Introduction contains background information that introduces the reader to the work or topic that is the subject of the entry and outlines modern interpretations of individual Shakespearean topic, plays, and poems.
  • © Reprinted Criticism for each entry consists of essays arranged chronologically under a variety of subheadings to facilitate the study of different aspects of the play, poem, or topic. This provides an overview of the major areas of concern in the analysis of Shakespeare’s works, as well as a useful perspective on changes in critical evaluation over recent decades. The critic’s name and the date of composition or publication of the critical work are given at the beginning of each piece of criticism. Unsigned criticism is preceded by the title of the source in which it appeared. Footnotes are reprinted at the end of each essay or excerpt. In the case of excerpted criticism, only those footnotes that pertain to the excerpted texts are included.
  • © A complete Bibliographical Citation of the original essay or book precedes each piece of criticism.
  • Acknowledgments

    The editors wish to thank the copyright holders of the excerpted criticism included in this volume and the permissions managers of many book and magazine publishing companies for assisting us in securing reproduction rights. We are also grateful to the staffs of the Detroit Public Library, the Library of Congress, the University of Detroit Mercy Library, Wayne State University Purdy/Kresge Library Complex, and the University of Michigan Libraries for making their resources available to us. Following is a list of the copyright holders who have granted us permission to reproduce material in this volume of SC. Every effort has been made to trace copyright, but if omissions have been made, please let us know.

    COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL IN SC, VOLUME 88, WAS REPRODUCED FROM THE FOLLOWING PERIODICALS:

    Back Stage, v. 41, February 11, 2000. Copyright © 2000 BPI Communications, Inc. Reproduced by permission.—CEA Critic, v. 35, March, 1973 for “Some Thoughts about King John” by Charles Stubblefield. Copyright © 1973 by the College English Association, Inc. Reproduced by permission of the publisher and the author.—CLA Journal, v. 13, June, 1970. Copyright © 1970 by The College Language Association. Used by permission of The College Language Association.— College Literature, v. 4, fall, 1997. Copyright © 1977 by West Chester State College. Reproduced by permission.—Detroit Free Press, August 24, 2003. Copyright © 2003 by Detroit Free Press. Reprinted by permission of the publisher.—ELH,v. 33, December, 1966. Copyright © 1966 The Johns Hopkins University Press. Reproduced by permission.—Financial Times, March 30, 2001; December 20, 2001; August 8, 2002. Copyright © 2001, 2002 Financial Times Information Ltd. All reproduced by permission.—Modern Language Quarterly, v. 54, December, 1993. Copyright © 1993 by The University of Washington. All rights reserved. Reproduced by permission of the publisher.—Mosaic, v. 36, March, 2003. Copyright © 2003 by Mosaic. Acknowledgment of previous publication is herewith made.—New Statesman, v. 132, March 10, 2003. Copyright © 2003 New Statesman, Ltd. Reproduced by permission.—New York Times, January 31, 2000. Copyright © 2001 The New York Times Company. Reproduced by permission.—Observer (London), April 1, 2001 for a review of King John by Susannah Clapp; March 2, 2003 for “So, Farewell, Clever Trevor: Trevor Nunn Bows out of the National Theatre with a Martial Production of Love’s Labour’s Lost” by Susannah Clapp. Copyright © 2001 Guardian Newspapers Limited. Both reproduced by permission of the author.—Renaissance Quarterly, v. 54, winter, 2001. Copyright © 2001 Renaissance Quarterly. Reproduced by permission.—Shakespeare Bulletin, v. 21, spring/summer, 2003;

  • v. 21, fall, 2003. Copyright © 2003 Shakespeare Bulletin. Both reproduced by permission.—Shakespeare Quarterly,v.24, winter, 1973; v. 35, spring, 1984; v. 47, summer, 1996; v. 54, summer, 2003. Copyright © 1973, 1984, 1996, 2003 by Folger Shakespeare Library. All reproduced by permission of The Johns Hopkins University Press.—Shakespeare Studies,
  • v. 14, 1981. Copyright © 1981, The Council for Research in the Renaissance. Reproduced by permission of Associated University Press.—Shakespeare Survey, v. 37, 1984; v. 54, 2001. Copyright © 1984, 2001 Shakespeare Survey. Both reprinted with the permission of Cambridge University Press.—Spectator, v. 288, May 18, 2002. Copyright © 2002 by The Spectator Ltd. U.K. Reproduced by permission of The Spectator.—Studia Neophilologica, v. 40, 1968. Copyright © 1968 Studia Neophilologica. Reproduced by permission of Taylor & Francis, AB.—Times Literary Supplement, April 7, 2000. Copyright © 2000 by The Times Supplements Limited. Reproduced from The Times Literary Supplement by permission.— Upstart Crow, v. 4, fall, 1982. Copyright © 1982 University of Tennessee. Reproduced by permission. / v. 12, 1992; v. 22, 2002. Copyright © 1992, 2003 Clemson University. All rights reserved. Reproduced by permission.—Variety, v. 390, March, 2003. Copyright © 2003 Variety Magazine, owned and published by Cahners Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier, Inc. All right reserved. Reproduced by permission.—War, Literature and the Arts, v. 12, spring-summer, 2000 for “Henry V: Shakespeare’s Just Warrior” by John Mark Mattox. Copyright © 2000 by War, Literature and Arts. Reproduced by permission of the author.—Washington Times, November 16, 2002. Copyright © 2002 News World Communications, Inc. Reprinted with permission of The Washington Times.
  • COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL IN SC, VOLUME 88, WAS REPRODUCED FROM THE FOLLOWING BOOKS:

    Baker, David Weil. From “‘Surpris’d with all’: Rereading Character in Much Ado about Nothing,”in Second Thoughts: A Focus on Rereading. Edited by David Galef. Wayne State University Press, 1998. Copyright © 1998 by Wayne State University Press. All rights reserved. Reproduced by permission of the publisher and author.—Barish, Jonas. From “War, Civil War, and Bruderkrieg in Shakespeare,” in Literature and Nationalism. Edited by Vincent Newey and Ann Thompson.

    Liverpool University Press, 1991. Copyright © 1991 by Liverpool University Press. All rights reserved. Reproduced by permission.—Beaurline, L. A. From the Introduction to The New Cambridge Shakespeare: King John. Edited by L. A. Beaurline. Cambridge University Press, 1990. Copyright © 1990 Cambridge University Press. Reproduced by permission of Cambridge University Press.—Caldwell, Ellen C. From “The Hundred Years’ War and National Identity,” in Inscribing the Hundred Years’ War in French and English Cultures. Edited by Denise N. Baker. State University Press of New York Press, 2000. Copyright © 2000 State University Press of New York. All rights reserved. Reproduced by permission of the State University of New York Press.—Carney, Jo Eldridge. From “The Ambiguities of Love and War in The Two Noble Kinsmen,”in Sexuality and Politics in Renaissance Drama. Edited by Carole Levin and Karen Robertson. Edwin Mellen Press, 1991. Copyright © 1991 by Carole Levin and Karen Robertson. All rights reserved. Reproduced by permission.— Cousin, Geraldine. From the Introduction to Shakespeare in Performance: King John. Manchester University Press, 1994. Copyright © Geraldine Cousin 1994. Reproduced by permission of the author.—Drakakis, John. From “Trust and Transgression: The Discursive Practices of Much Ado about Nothing,”in Post-structuralist Readings of English Poetry. Edited by Richard Machin and Christopher Norris. Cambridge University Press, 1987. Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987. Reprinted with the permission of Cambridge University Press.—Gilbert, Miriam. From “‘As it was presented before her Highness’: Love’s Labour’s Lost on the Elizabethan Stage,” in Shakespeare in Performance: Love’s Labour’s Lost. Edited by J. R. Mulryne, J. C. Bulman, and Margaret Shewring. Manchester University Press, 1993. Copyright © 1993 by Miriam Gilbert. Reproduced by permission of the publisher and the author.—Hamel, Guy. From “King John and The Troublesome Raigne: A Reexamination,” in King John: New Perspectives. Edited by Deborah T. Curren-Aquino. Associated University Presses, 1989. Copyright © 1989 by Associated University Presses, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduced by permission.—Helms, Lorraine. From “Stills Wars and Lechery: Shakespeare and the Last Trojan Woman,” in Arms and the Woman: War, Gender, and Literary Representation. Edited by Helen M. Cooper, Adrienne Auslander Munich, and Susan Merrill Squier. University of North Carolina Press, 1989. Copyright © 1989 by The University of North Carolina Press. All rights reserved. Reproduced by permission of the publisher.—Humphreys, A. R. From the Introduction to The Arden Shakespeare: Much Ado about Nothing. Edited by A. R. Humphreys. Methuen, 1981. Copyright © 1981 by Methuen & Co. Ltd. Reproduced by permission of International Thomson Publishing Services Ltd. and the author.—Kehler, Dorothea. From “Jaquenetta’s Baby’s Father: Recovering Paternity in Love’s Labor’s Lost,”in Renaissance Papers, 1990. Edited by Dale B. J. Randall and Joseph A. Porter. The Southeastern Renaissance Conference, 1990. All rights reserved. Reproduced by permission of Boydell & Brewer, Inc.—Kerrigan, John. From the Introduction to William Shakespeare’s Love’s Labour’s Lost. Edited by John Kerrigan. Penguin Books, 1982. Copyright © 1982, 1996 by John Kerrigan. All rights reserved. Used by permission of the author.—Levin, Richard A. From “Crime and Cover-up in Messina,” in Love and Society in Shakespearean Comedy: A Study of Dramatic Form and Content. Edited by Harold Bloom. University of Delaware Press, 1985. Copyright © 1985 by Associated University Presses, Inc. Reproduced by permission.—Marsland, Elizabeth. From “Updating Agincourt: The Battle Scenes in Two Film Versions of Henry V,”in Modern War on Stage and Screen. Edited by Wolfgang Gortschacher and Holger Klein. Edwin Mellen Press, 1997. Copyright © 1997 by The Edwin Mellen Press. All rights reserved. Reproduced by permission.—Maus, Katharine Eisaman. From “Transfer of Title in Love’s Labor’s Lost: Language, Individualism, Gender,” in Shakespeare Left and Right. Edited by Ivo Kamps. Routledge, 1991. Copyright © 1991 by Routledge, Chapman and Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduced by permission of the author and Routledge/Taylor & Francis Books, Inc.—Meron, Theodor. From Bloody Constraint: War and Chivalry in Shakespeare. Oxford University Press, 1998. Copyright © 1998 by Theodor Meron. All rights reserved. Used by permission of Oxford University Press Inc.—Meron, Theodor. From Henry’s Wars and Shakespeare’s Laws: Perspectives on the Law of War in the Later Middle Ages. Clarendon Press, 1993. Copyright © 1993 by Theodor Meron. All rights reserved. Reproduced by permission of Oxford University Press.—Nakanori, Koshi. From “The Structure of Love’s Labour’s Lost,” in Love’s Labour’s Lost: Critical Essays. Edited by Felicia Hardison Londre. Translated from the Japanese by Toru Iwasaki. Garland Publishing, Inc., 1997. Copyright © 1997 by Felicia Hardison Londre. All rights reserved. Reproduced by permission of the Routledge/Taylor & Francis Books, Inc.—Prouty, Charles T. From The Sources of Much Ado about Nothing: A Critical Study. Yale University Press, 1950. Copyright © 1950 by Yale University Press. Renewed 1978 by Charles T. Prouty. All rights reserved. Reproduced by permission.—Skura, Meredith Anne. From “Armado and Costard in The French Academy: Player as Clown,” in Love’s Labour’s Lost: Critical Essays. Edited by Felicia Hardison Londre. Garland Publishing, Inc., 1997. Copyright © 1993 by the University of Chicago. Reproduced by permission of the publisher and author.—Snyder, Susan. From “The Norwegians Are Coming!: Shakespearean Misleadings,” in Elizabethan Theatre. Edited by R. B. Parker and S. P. Zitner. University of Delaware Press, 1996. Copyright © 1996 by Associated University Presses, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduced by permission.—Thomas, Sidney. From “Mannerism and Anti-Mannerism in Love’s Labour’s Lost: ‘The Words of Mercury are Harsh After the Songs of Apollo,’” in Shakespeare’s Universe: Renaissance Ideas and Conventions. Edited by John M. Mucciolo, Steven J. Doloff, and Edward A. Rauchut. Scolar Press, 1996. Copyright © 1996 by Sidney Thomas. Reproduced by permission.—Tucker, Kenneth. From Shakespeare and Jungian Typology: A Reading of the Plays. McFarland & Company, Inc., 2003. Copyright © 2003 Kenneth Tucker. All rights reserved. Reproduced by permission of McFarland & Company, Inc., Box 611, Jefferson NC 28640. ww.mcfarlandpub.com.—Willems, Michèle. From “Women and Horses and Power and War: Worship of Mars from 1 Henry IV to Coriolanus,”in French Essays on Shakespeare and His Contemporaries. Edited by Jean-Marie Manguin and Michèle Willems. University of Delaware Press, 1995. Copyright © 1995 by Associated University Presses, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduced by permission.

    PHOTOGRAPHS APPEARING IN SC, VOLUME 88, WERE RECEIVED FROM THE FOLLOWING SOURCES:

    All’s Well That Ends Well. Helena and Bertram in a scene from All’s Well That Ends Well. From Shakespearean Scenes (1876), photograph. Special Collections Library, University of Michigan. Reproduced by permission.—Henry V. Kenneth Branagh as Henry V and Brian Blessed as Exeter in a scene from Kenneth Branagh’s 1989 film adaptation of Henry V, photograph. The Kobal Collection. Reproduced by permission.—King John, Act III, scene i. King John, King Philip, Cardinal Pandulph, Arthur, Constance, and others, by Max Adamo (artist) and Tob. Bauer (engraver). Special Collections Library, University of Michigan. Reproduced by permission.—King John, Act IV, scene i. Huburt and Arthur, by Max Adamo (artist) and J. Bankel (engraver). Special Collections Library, University of Michigan. Reproduced by permission.—King John. Franklin McLeay as King John, ca. 1899, London, England, photograph. Copyright © Hulton-Deutsch Collection/Corbis. Reproduced by permission.—King John. Prince Arthur and Hubert, by John Rogers, 19th century, photograph. Copyright © Historical Picture Archive/Corbis. Reproduced by permission.—Love’s Labour’s Lost, Act III, scene i. Armado and Moth. Illustration by Norman Wilkinson of Four Oaks from Love’s Labour’s Lost, Players’ Shakespeare Series, 1924. Rare Book and Special Collections Division, Library of Congress. Reproduced by permission.—Love’s Labour’s Lost, Act V, scene ii. Princess of France, Katharine, Rosaline, Maria, and others. Special Collections Library, University of Michigan. Reproduced by permission.—Love’s Labour’s Lost. Robert Portal as Dumaine, Jeremy Northam as Berowne, Owen Teale as King of Navarre, and David Birrell as Longaville in the 1994 Royal Shakespeare Company production of Love’s Labour’s Lost, photograph. Copyright © Robbie Jack/Corbis. Reproduced by permission.—Much Ado About Nothing, Act III, scene iii. Borachio, Conrade, and Watchmen, by Francis Wheatley (artist) and George Noble (engraver). Special Collections Library, University of Michigan. Reproduced by permission.—Much Ado About Nothing. Actors portraying Don John, Borachio, and Claudio (pretending to be Benedick) in a scene from the 1952 production of Much Ado about Nothing at the Phoenix Theatre in London, photograph by Godfrey Thurston Hopkins. Copyright © Hulton-Deutsch Collection/Corbis. Reproduced by permission.—Much Ado About Nothing. Diana Wynyard as Beatrice and John Gielgud as Benedick in a scene from the 1952 production of Much Ado about Nothing at the Phoenix Theatre in London, photograph by Godfrey Thurston Hopkins. Copyright © Historical Picture Archive/Corbis. Reproduced by permission.—Troilus and Cressida. Joseph Fiennes as Troilus and Victoria Hamilton as Cressida in a scene from the 1996 Royal Shakespeare Company production of Troilus and Cressida, photograph. Copyright © Robbie Jack/Corbis. Reproduced by permission.

    Thomson Gale Literary Criticism Series Advisory Board

    The members of the Thomson Gale Literary Criticism Series Advisory Board—reference librarians and subject specialists from public, academic, and school library systems—represent a cross-section of our customer base and offer a variety of informed perspectives on both the presentation and content of our literature criticism products. Advisory board members assess and define such quality issues as the relevance, currency, and usefulness of the author coverage, critical content, and literary topics included in our series; evaluate the layout, presentation, and general quality of our printed volumes; provide feedback on the criteria used for selecting authors and topics covered in our series; provide suggestions for potential enhancements to our series; identify any gaps in our coverage of authors or literary topics, recommending authors or topics for inclusion; analyze the appropriateness of our content and presentation for various user audiences, such as high school students, undergraduates, graduate students, librarians, and educators; and offer feedback on any proposed changes/ enhancements to our series. We wish to thank the following advisors for their advice throughout the year.

    Barbara M. Bibel Heather Martin

    Librarian Arts & Humanities Librarian Oakland Public Library University of Alabama at Birmingham, Sterne Library Oakland, California Birmingham, Alabama

    Dr. Toby Burrows Susan Mikula

    Principal Librarian Librarian The Scholars’ Centre Indiana Free Library University of Western Australia Library Indiana, Pennsylvania Nedlands, Western Australia

    Thomas Nixon Celia C. Daniel Humanities Reference Librarian

    Associate Reference Librarian University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Davis Howard University Libraries Library

    Washington, D.C. Chapel Hill, North Carolina

    David M. Durant Mark Schumacher

    Reference Librarian

    Joyner Library Jackson Library East Carolina University University of North Carolina at Greensboro

    Greenville, North Carolina Greensboro, North Carolina

    Nancy T. Guidry Gwen Scott-Miller

    Librarian Assistant Director Bakersfield Community College Sno-Isle Regional Library System Bakersfield, California Marysville, Washington

    Lookup any word on eNotes with our dictionary. Highlight the word and press SHIFT + D for a definition, or SHIFT + T for a synonym.