King John (Vol. 88) | Charles Stubblefield (essay date March 1973)

Charles Stubblefield (essay date March 1973)

SOURCE: Stubblefield, Charles. “Some Thoughts about King John.CEA Critic 35, no. 3 (March 1973): 25-8.

[In the following essay, Stubblefield presents contrasting appraisals of John and the Bastard based on their differing perceptions of the chaotic, deceitful, and insecure political world of Shakespeare's King John.]

No two commentators read Shakespeare's King John alike, and in some instances there are directly opposed views as to what the meaning of the play is. What characterizes a large portion of the criticism that one reads on King John is its tendency to consider only one element of the play, such as characterization or imagery. Such criticism, while it is true enough in its limited way, cannot hope to derive a meaning which is valid for the total play. Most commentators seem reluctant to look at the play closely to determine just what its central issues are....

[The entire page is 2424 words long]

Join eNotes

The above is a free excerpt. Get total access to this content with the:

Lookup any word on eNotes with our dictionary. Highlight the word and press SHIFT + D for a definition, or SHIFT + T for a synonym.