Home > Shakespearean Criticism > Julius Caesar (Vol. 85) - Ruth M. Levitsky (essay date March 1973)
Julius Caesar (Vol. 85) - Ruth M. Levitsky (essay date March 1973)
Ruth M. Levitsky (essay date March 1973)
SOURCE: Levitsky, Ruth M. “The Elements Were So Mix'd …” PMLA 88, no. 2 (March 1973): 240-45.
[In the following essay, Levitsky illuminates Brutus's Stoic virtues and contrasts his character with the less admirable Caesar.]
In a survey of the half-century (1900-50) of scholarship dealing with Shakespeare's Roman plays, J. C. Maxwell commends Sir Mark Hunter's “Politics and Character in Shakespeare's Julius Caesar” as “one of the first among modern attempts to correct the tendency to overidealize Brutus and give him too central a part in the play.”1 In the thirty-odd years since Hunter's study was published this overidealization, I suggest, has been overcorrected.2 For while it is true that Brutus is not the ideal hero that Henry v is, he is still the noblest Roman of them all. This, I submit, is all that Shakespeare ever intended him to be; but that all is...
[The entire page is 4600 words long]
Join eNotes
Over 3,500 study guides, question and answer forums, literature criticism, reference content, and much more!
Navigate
- Introduction
- Criticism: Overviews And General Studies
- Criticism: Character Studies
- Criticism: Production Reviews
-
Criticism: Themes
- Joseph S. M. J. Chang (essay date January 1970)
- R. J. Kaufmann and Clifford J. Ronan (essay date spring 1970)
- A. W. Bellringer (essay date spring 1970)
- Myron Taylor (essay date summer 1973)
- Marvin L. Vawter (essay date July 1973)
- Richard Wilson (essay date 1993)
- Robin Headlam Wells (essay date 2002)
- Further Reading
- Copyright
