Home > Shakespearean Criticism > Julius Caesar (Vol. 85) - Joseph S. M. J. Chang (essay date January 1970)
Julius Caesar (Vol. 85) - Joseph S. M. J. Chang (essay date January 1970)
Joseph S. M. J. Chang (essay date January 1970)
SOURCE: Chang, Joseph S. M. J. “Julius Caesar in the Light of Renaissance Historiography.” Journal of English and Germanic Philology 69, no. 1 (January 1970): 63-71.
[In the following essay, Chang views Julius Caesar as a demonstration of Shakespeare's historical relativism.]
Criticism of Julius Caesar has moved steadily toward the position recently taken by Mildred E. Hartsock, that the play “is a demonstration that the truth of character cannot be known.”1 Earlier critics had become reconciled to a divided characterization of Caesar, and they began to find inconsonances in Brutus as well.2 The more the play is examined, the more one is inclined to accept the conclusion Miss Hartsock tentatively offers: “Perhaps Shakespeare was playing a bitter ‘modern’ trick, and, in the spirit of Pilate's embarrassing question, implying that...
[The entire page is 4081 words long]
Join eNotes
Over 3,500 study guides, question and answer forums, literature criticism, reference content, and much more!
Navigate
- Introduction
- Criticism: Overviews And General Studies
- Criticism: Character Studies
- Criticism: Production Reviews
-
Criticism: Themes
- Joseph S. M. J. Chang (essay date January 1970)
- R. J. Kaufmann and Clifford J. Ronan (essay date spring 1970)
- A. W. Bellringer (essay date spring 1970)
- Myron Taylor (essay date summer 1973)
- Marvin L. Vawter (essay date July 1973)
- Richard Wilson (essay date 1993)
- Robin Headlam Wells (essay date 2002)
- Further Reading
- Copyright
