Home > Shakespearean Criticism > Julius Caesar (Vol. 85) - Bruce Weber (review date 22 July 2003)
Julius Caesar (Vol. 85) - Bruce Weber (review date 22 July 2003)
Bruce Weber (review date 22 July 2003)
SOURCE: Weber, Bruce. Review of Julius Caesar. New York Times (22 July 2003): E1, E5.
[In the following review, Weber admires director Daniel Sullivan's 2003 production of Julius Caesar staged at the Old Globe Theater in San Diego, particularly its imaginative and politically evocative setting which depicted life after the collapse of the American empire and suggested the destructive legacy imposed by worldly ambition.]
Julius Caesar is so full of aphorisms and declarations that onstage it often succumbs to pomposity. The play is so concerned with the difference between what men say and what they think as they jockey for power that it is frequently performed with two-faced hyperbole. And it is so determined to illustrate the manipulative nature of politics that in performance it can drip with irony or light up its contemporary relevance in neon. No wonder it is a junior high...
[The entire page is 1142 words long]
Join eNotes
Over 3,500 study guides, question and answer forums, literature criticism, reference content, and much more!
Navigate
- Introduction
- Criticism: Overviews And General Studies
- Criticism: Character Studies
- Criticism: Production Reviews
-
Criticism: Themes
- Joseph S. M. J. Chang (essay date January 1970)
- R. J. Kaufmann and Clifford J. Ronan (essay date spring 1970)
- A. W. Bellringer (essay date spring 1970)
- Myron Taylor (essay date summer 1973)
- Marvin L. Vawter (essay date July 1973)
- Richard Wilson (essay date 1993)
- Robin Headlam Wells (essay date 2002)
- Further Reading
- Copyright
