Henry VI, Parts 1, 2, and 3 (Vol. 74) | Further Reading
FURTHER READING
CRITICISM
Caldwell, Ellen C. “Jack Cade and Shakespeare's Henry VI, Part 2.” Studies in Philology 92, no. 1 (winter 1995): 18-79.
Examines the historical documents concerning the Jack Cade rebellion, and argues that in Henry VI, Part 2, Shakespeare indicated his ambivalence toward the uprising.
Dutton, Richard. “Shakespeare and Lancaster.” Shakespeare Quarterly 49, no. 1 (spring 1998): 1-21.
Explores the idea that the history plays, including Henry VI, Parts 1, 2, and 3, demonstrate that Shakespeare was a “Catholic recusant,” or someone unwilling to attend Church of England services.
Nunns, Stephen. “Regarding ‘Henry’: Two Directors Talk Shop.” American Theatre 14, no. 3 (March 1997): 44-7.
Presents a discussion with theater directors Michael Kahn and Karin Coonrad regarding their productions of the Henry VI...
[The entire page is 286 words long]
Navigate
