Home > School for Scandal Summary & Study Guide > Essays and Criticism > Review of The School for Scandal
School for Scandal | Review of The School for Scandal
John Clifford expresses disappointment at being denied the full pleasure of Sheridan's play. Complaining of poor technical values and a general lack of enthusiasm, the critic feels that the play deserves better attention.
To a writer a theatre like the Royal Lyceum is a magic box full of enticing possibilities—to all of which, almost invariably, you are denied access. To an Artistic Director, on the other hand, such a place must more often feel like a black hole—with row after row of empty seats that somehow, night after night, have got to be filled.
The theatre's understandable response to this has been to mount two classic comedies in repertory—a revival of their immensely successful production of Tartuffe in tandem with a new production...
[The entire page is 593 words long]
Join eNotes
The above is a free excerpt. Get total access to this content with the:
Summary and Analysis – Themes – Characters – And much more...
Join eNotes
Over 3,500 study guides, question and answer forums, literature criticism, reference content, and much more!
Navigate
- School for Scandal: Introduction
- School for Scandal: Summary
- School for Scandal: Richard Brinsley Sheridan Biography
- School for Scandal: Characters
- School for Scandal: Themes
- School for Scandal: Style
- School for Scandal: Historical Context
- School for Scandal: Critical Overview
- School for Scandal: Essays and Criticism
- School for Scandal: Compare and Contrast
- School for Scandal: Topics for Further Study
- School for Scandal: Media Adaptations
- School for Scandal: What Do I Read Next?
- School for Scandal: Bibliography and Further Reading
- School for Scandal: Pictures
- Copyright
Related Topics
Tell a friend about School for Scandal at eNotes.
