Home > R.U.R. Summary & Study Guide > Essays and Criticism > Helots
R.U.R. | Helots
Lewisohn reviews the 1922 London production
of R.U.R., terming the production a success as both
a work of ideas and an entertaining evening of theatre.
There are two kinds of notions in the world. There is the kind that hits you between the eyes; there is the kind that irradiates the soul. Thus there are two kinds of art. There is the art that dazzles and grows dark; there is the art that shines calmly and forever. It would be a sorry sort of affectation to deny one’s natural interest in the merely striking and merely dazzling, especially when it is implicated with powerful forces beyond itself. But it is healthy and necessary to keep the difference in mind. I do not at all blame the Theater Guild for producing...
[The entire page is 856 words long]
Join eNotes
The above is a free excerpt. Get total access to this content with the:
Summary and Analysis – Themes – Characters – And much more...
Join eNotes
Over 3,500 study guides, question and answer forums, literature criticism, reference content, and much more!
Navigate
- R.U.R.: Introduction
- R.U.R.: Summary
- R.U.R.: Karel Capek Biography
- R.U.R.: Characters
- R.U.R.: Themes
- R.U.R.: Style
- R.U.R.: Historical Context
- R.U.R.: Critical Overview
- R.U.R.: Essays and Criticism
- R.U.R.: Compare and Contrast
- R.U.R.: Topics for Further Study
- R.U.R.: What Do I Read Next?
- R.U.R.: Bibliography and Further Reading
- R.U.R.: Pictures
- Copyright
Tell a friend about R.U.R. at eNotes.
