Religion in America | Special Legal Protections Are Necessary to Ensure Religious Freedom

In 1993 Congress passed the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA). RFRA established that general state and federal laws could not impose “substantial” burdens on religious exercise unless there was a “compelling” state interest. In 1997, however, the Supreme Court ruled that Congress had exceeded its constitutional authority in passing this law. The following viewpoint is taken from testimony given by Marc D. Stern before Congress in hearings following the Supreme Court’s 1997 ruling. Stern is a lawyer with the American Jewish Congress. He argues that RFRA served as a useful...

[The entire page is 3467 words long]

Join eNotes

The above is a free excerpt. Get total access to this content with the: