Are Efforts to Reduce Terrorism Successful?
Are Efforts to Reduce Terrorism Successful? | Preemptive War Reduces Terrorism
Michael J. Glennon, professor of international law at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University, is the author of many articles and books, including Limits of Law, Prerogatives of Power: Interventionism After Kosovo.
Anticipatory self-defense, or the doctrine of preemption, holds that it is acceptable for a state to attack a known hostile enemy before that enemy can attack it. Although prohibited by the United Nations Charter in 1945, anticipatory self-defense was necessary throughout the twentieth century, and it continues to be into the...
[The entire page is 2917 words long]
Navigate
- Introduction
-
Table of Contents
- America Is Winning the War on Terrorism
- America Is Losing the War on Terrorism
- A War on Terrorism Is Futile
- Expanded Law Enforcement Powers Have Reduced Terrorism
- Expanded Law Enforcement Powers Violate Civil Liberties
- Preemptive War Reduces Terrorism
- Preemptive War Does Not Reduce Terrorism
- Military Might Is the Best Way to Reduce Terrorism
- Intelligence Gathering Is the Best Way to Reduce Terrorism
- Racial Profiling Reduces Terrorism
- Racial Profiling Does Not Reduce Terrorism
- Immigration Must Be Restricted to Reduce Terrorism
- Restricting Immigration Does Not Reduce Terrorism
- Efforts to Make Air Travel Safe from Terrorists Have Failed
- America’s Dependence on Foreign Oil Is Undermining Efforts to Reduce Terrorism
- Organizations to Contact
- Bibliography
- Copyright
Tell a friend about Are Efforts to Reduce Terrorism Successful? at eNotes.
