Criticism > Poetry > The Ring and the Book, Robert Browning - L. M. Findlay (essay date winter 1991)
The Ring and the Book, Robert Browning - L. M. Findlay (essay date winter 1991)
L. M. Findlay (essay date winter 1991)
SOURCE: Findlay, L. M. “Taking the Measure of Différance: Deconstruction and The Ring and the Book.” Victorian Poetry 29, no. 4 (winter 1991): 401-14.
[In the following essay, Findlay conducts a deconstructive reading of The Ring and the Book.]
In the 1990s, when the reception of deconstruction has moved beyond the extremes of zealotry and hostility that marked its early career in North America, there is a continuing need to register indebtedness to its principal proponents in a careful, reasoned, yet critical way. In this essay I hope to contribute to this process by testing several contentions associated with the Derridean coinage, différance, against the experience of reading Robert Browning's The Ring and the Book (1868-69). Recently, other critics have made similar attempts, reading the poem as a “decentered struggle of interpretations”; as “a nesting...
[The entire page is 7202 words long]
Join eNotes
Over 3,500 study guides, question and answer forums, literature criticism, reference content, and much more!
Navigate
- Introduction
- Principal Works
-
Criticism
- John M. Menaghan (essay date spring 1983)
- Mary Ellis Gibson (essay date 1985)
- Anne Hiemstra (essay date 1985)
- Paul Zietlow (essay date spring 1987)
- W. Warwick Slinn (essay date autumn-winter 1989)
- Susan C. Hines (essay date 1990)
- Mary Ellis Gibson (essay date 1990)
- L. M. Findlay (essay date winter 1991)
- Simon Petch (essay date 1992)
- Alexander Pettit (essay date spring 1993)
- Candace Ward (essay date spring 1996)
- Melissa Valiska Gregory (essay date winter 2000)
- Norman Friedman (essay date May 2000)
- Further Reading
- Copyright
