Paradise Lost, John Milton - Arthur E. Barker (essay date 1949)
Arthur E. Barker (essay date 1949)
SOURCE: “Structural Pattern in Paradise Lost,” in Milton: Modern Essays in Criticism, edited by Arthur E. Barker, Oxford University Press, 1965, pp. 142-55.
[In the following essay, originally published in Philological Quarterly in 1949, Barker discusses how in Paradise Lost Milton moved away from a Virgilian ten-book, five-act structure to a twelve-book form that ultimately serves to reduce Satan's power over the poem.]
Milton, as Professor Thompson has said, “realized that form is determined not by rule or precedent but by the thought to be expressed. Hence he adapted the pattern of the epic to his own ends, and wrote as a creative artist.”1
From its opening invocation Paradise Lost invites attention to this process of adaptation and transcendence. The initial statement of the threefold subject (disobedience and woe, till restoration) immediately...
[The entire page is 6062 words long]
Join eNotes
Over 3,500 study guides, question and answer forums, literature criticism, reference content, and much more!
Navigate
- Introduction
- Principal Works
-
Criticism
- Samuel Johnson (essay date 1781)
- William Vaughn Moody (essay date 1899)
- C. S. Lewis (essay date 1942)
- Helen Gardner (essay date 1948)
- Arthur E. Barker (essay date 1949)
- Geoffrey Hartman (essay date 1958)
- Frank Kermode (essay date 1960)
- Don Cameron Allen (essay date 1961)
- B. Rajan (essay date 1964)
- Michael Fixler (essay date 1969)
- Barbara K. Lewalski (essay date 1974)
- Louis L. Martz (essay date 1980)
- Joan Malory Webber (essay date 1980)
- Balachandra Rajan (essay date 1983)
- Diane McColley (essay date 1988)
- Michael Wilding (essay date 1995)
- Further Reading
- Copyright
