Oppen, George - William Carlos Williams (review date 1934)
William Carlos Williams (review date 1934)
SOURCE: A review of Discrete Series, in Poetry, Vol. XLIV, No. IV, July, 1934, pp. 220-25.
[In the following essay, Williams reviews Discrete Series, discusses what makes a poem a poem and what makes a poem good, and praises Oppen for the quality of his poems.]
Mr. Oppen has given us thirty-seven pages of short poems, well printed and well bound, around which several statements relative to modern verse forms may well be made.
The appearance of a book of poems, if it be a book of good poems, is an important event because of relationships the work it contains will have with thought and accomplishment in other contemporary reaches of the intelligence. This leads to a definition of the term “good.” If the poems in the book constitute necessary corrections of or emendations to human conduct in their day, both as to thought and manner, then they are good. But if these changes...
[The entire page is 1508 words long]
Join eNotes
Over 3,500 study guides, question and answer forums, literature criticism, reference content, and much more!
Navigate
- Introduction
- Principal Works
-
Criticism
- Ezra Pound (essay date 1934)
- William Rose Benet (essay date 1934)
- William Carlos Williams (review date 1934)
- Denise Levertov (essay date 1963)
- Donald Davie (essay date 1973)
- Paul Zweig (essay date 1973)
- Kevin Powers with George and Mary Oppen (interview date 1975)
- Cid Corman (review date 1976)
- John Taggart (essay date 1979)
- Alan Young (essay date 1980)
- Cid Corman (essay date 1981)
- Harvey Kail (essay date 1981)
- David McAleavy (essay date 1981)
- Norman M. Finkelstein (essay date 1981)
- Andrew Crozier (essay date 1984)
- Michael Heller (essay date 1985)
- Alan Golding (essay date 1988)
- Burton Hatlen (essay date 1993)
- Cauthen Cramer (essay date 1994)
- Further Reading
- Copyright
