Oppen, George - Paul Zweig (essay date 1973)
Paul Zweig (essay date 1973)
SOURCE: “Making and Unmaking,” in Partisan Review, Vol. XL, No. 2, 1973, pp. 273-76.
[In the following assessment of Of Being Numerous, Zweig praises Oppen's poems as “tightly wrought meditations” that are “sculptural in their precision.”]
The fortunes of reputation are strange. For thirty years, George Oppen received the highest praise from men like Ezra Pound and William Carlos Williams, yet his work was virtually unknown, even among poets. The fashions came and went. Proletarian poetry in the 1930s and 40s; bland rhetorical poetry in the 1950s; imagist surreal poetry in the 1960s. At long intervals, Oppen published volumes of difficult, tightly written poems: four volumes in thirty years. Not a prolific writer, not a representative of familiar fashions or schools. Even the free-wheeling tastes of the 1960s seemed not to affect George Oppen's isolation. Then in 1969, to the general...
[The entire page is 1030 words long]
Join eNotes
Over 3,500 study guides, question and answer forums, literature criticism, reference content, and much more!
Navigate
- Introduction
- Principal Works
-
Criticism
- Ezra Pound (essay date 1934)
- William Rose Benet (essay date 1934)
- William Carlos Williams (review date 1934)
- Denise Levertov (essay date 1963)
- Donald Davie (essay date 1973)
- Paul Zweig (essay date 1973)
- Kevin Powers with George and Mary Oppen (interview date 1975)
- Cid Corman (review date 1976)
- John Taggart (essay date 1979)
- Alan Young (essay date 1980)
- Cid Corman (essay date 1981)
- Harvey Kail (essay date 1981)
- David McAleavy (essay date 1981)
- Norman M. Finkelstein (essay date 1981)
- Andrew Crozier (essay date 1984)
- Michael Heller (essay date 1985)
- Alan Golding (essay date 1988)
- Burton Hatlen (essay date 1993)
- Cauthen Cramer (essay date 1994)
- Further Reading
- Copyright
