Oppen, George - Cauthen Cramer (essay date 1994)
Cauthen Cramer (essay date 1994)
SOURCE: “Deep Image and the Poetics of Oppen's ‘Of Being Numerous,’” in Sagetrieb, The National Poetry Foundation, Inc., Vol. 13, No. 3, Winter, 1994, pp. 71-82.
[In the following essay, Cramer compares Oppen's objectivism with the deep image poetics of James Wright and Robert Bly.]
In 1963, June Oppen Degnan attempted to interest her brother in Jungian psychology. Although George Oppen found Jung's character compelling, he dismissed the Jungian system, calling it finally “muddy, so lazy minded” (“Letters” 224). In his rejection of Jung, Oppen opposed himself to the philosophical basis for the “deep image” poetry exemplified by Robert Bly and James Wright, one of the most formidable poetic movements of the 1960s.
The differences in poetics between Oppen and the deep imagists are fundamental because Oppen departed from Jung at the most fundamental level:
There...
[The entire page is 4525 words long]
Join eNotes
Over 3,500 study guides, question and answer forums, literature criticism, reference content, and much more!
Navigate
- Introduction
- Principal Works
-
Criticism
- Ezra Pound (essay date 1934)
- William Rose Benet (essay date 1934)
- William Carlos Williams (review date 1934)
- Denise Levertov (essay date 1963)
- Donald Davie (essay date 1973)
- Paul Zweig (essay date 1973)
- Kevin Powers with George and Mary Oppen (interview date 1975)
- Cid Corman (review date 1976)
- John Taggart (essay date 1979)
- Alan Young (essay date 1980)
- Cid Corman (essay date 1981)
- Harvey Kail (essay date 1981)
- David McAleavy (essay date 1981)
- Norman M. Finkelstein (essay date 1981)
- Andrew Crozier (essay date 1984)
- Michael Heller (essay date 1985)
- Alan Golding (essay date 1988)
- Burton Hatlen (essay date 1993)
- Cauthen Cramer (essay date 1994)
- Further Reading
- Copyright
