Kubla Khan, Samuel Taylor Coleridge - Timothy Bahti (essay date 1981)
Timothy Bahti (essay date 1981)
SOURCE: Bahti, Timothy. “Coleridge's ‘Kubla Khan’ and the Fragment of Romanticism.” Modern Language Notes 96, no. 5 (December 1981): 1035-50.
[In the following essay, Bahti evaluates “Kubla Khan” as it encapsulates the self-fragmenting quality of Romanticism.]
I wrote reflections that, in many ways, were even stronger than their origin.
—Derek Walcott
[Der] negative Sinn … entsteht, wenn einer bloß den Geist hat, ohne den Buchstaben; oder umgekehrt. …
—Friedrich Schlegel1
When Coleridge's “Kubla Khan” appeared in 1816, the contemporary reviewers spoke of the poem's “nonsense.” This “nonsense” was immediately related to the ostensibly partial character of the poem: it was not wholly a meaningful poem, but only meaningless music; or else, Coleridge had dared too much, and...
[The entire page is 6650 words long]
Join eNotes
Over 3,500 study guides, question and answer forums, literature criticism, reference content, and much more!
Navigate
- Introduction
- Principal Works
-
Criticism
- Augustan Review (review date 1816)
- Scourge and Satirist (review date 1816)
- Thomas Moore (review date 1816)
- Monthly Review (review date 1817)
- John Livingston Lowes (essay date 1927)
- Harold Bloom (essay date 1961)
- Richard Gerber (essay date 1963)
- Irene H. Chayes (essay date 1966)
- George G. Watson (essay date 1966)
- Kenneth Burke (essay date 1966)
- Charles I. Patterson Jr. (essay date 1974)
- Richard Hoffpauir (essay date 1976)
- Timothy Bahti (essay date 1981)
- John Beer (essay date 1985)
- Ken Frieden (essay date 1985)
- Stefan Ball (essay date 2001)
- Further Reading
- Copyright
