Kubla Khan, Samuel Taylor Coleridge - Richard Hoffpauir (essay date 1976)
Richard Hoffpauir (essay date 1976)
SOURCE: Hoffpauir, Richard. “‘Kubla Khan’ and the Critics: Romantic Madness as Poetic Theme and Critical Response.” English Studies in Canada 2, no. 4 (winter 1976): 402-22.
[In the following essay, Hoffpauir surveys critical estimates of “Kubla Khan” since its first publication, arguing that the poem is “imagistically incoherent,” formally “imprecise,” and fails to live up to the designation of great poetry by which generations of scholars have regarded it.]
When the October 1974 issue of PMLA contained yet another article on “Kubla Khan” with the all too familiar subtitle, “Toward Interpretation,” I was reminded of and impressed by the continued solvency of the “Kubla Khan” industry. My researches had confirmed my suspicion that it is one of the most discussed poems in our literature and, as Charles Patterson, the writer of the PMLA article, began,...
[The entire page is 11068 words long]
Join eNotes
Over 3,500 study guides, question and answer forums, literature criticism, reference content, and much more!
Navigate
- Introduction
- Principal Works
-
Criticism
- Augustan Review (review date 1816)
- Scourge and Satirist (review date 1816)
- Thomas Moore (review date 1816)
- Monthly Review (review date 1817)
- John Livingston Lowes (essay date 1927)
- Harold Bloom (essay date 1961)
- Richard Gerber (essay date 1963)
- Irene H. Chayes (essay date 1966)
- George G. Watson (essay date 1966)
- Kenneth Burke (essay date 1966)
- Charles I. Patterson Jr. (essay date 1974)
- Richard Hoffpauir (essay date 1976)
- Timothy Bahti (essay date 1981)
- John Beer (essay date 1985)
- Ken Frieden (essay date 1985)
- Stefan Ball (essay date 2001)
- Further Reading
- Copyright
