Kubla Khan, Samuel Taylor Coleridge - Monthly Review (review date 1817)
Monthly Review (review date 1817)
SOURCE: Review of Christabel; Kubla Khan, a Vision; The Pains of Sleep, by Samuel Taylor Coleridge. Monthly Review 82 (January 1817): 22-25.
[In the following excerpted review, the unsigned reviewer describes “Kubla Khan” as “below criticism.”]
The fragment of ‘Kubla Khan’ is declared to have been composed in a dream, and is published as the author wrote it. Allowing every possible accuracy to the statement of Mr. Coleridge, we would yet ask him whether this extraordinary fragment was not rather the effect of rapid and instant composition after he was awake, than of memory immediately recording that which he dreamt when asleep? By what process of consciousness could he distinguish between such composition and such reminiscence? Impressed as his mind was with his interesting dream, and habituated as he is (notwithstanding his accidental cessation from versifying) to the momentary...
[The entire page is 365 words long]
Join eNotes
Over 3,500 study guides, question and answer forums, literature criticism, reference content, and much more!
Navigate
- Introduction
- Principal Works
-
Criticism
- Augustan Review (review date 1816)
- Scourge and Satirist (review date 1816)
- Thomas Moore (review date 1816)
- Monthly Review (review date 1817)
- John Livingston Lowes (essay date 1927)
- Harold Bloom (essay date 1961)
- Richard Gerber (essay date 1963)
- Irene H. Chayes (essay date 1966)
- George G. Watson (essay date 1966)
- Kenneth Burke (essay date 1966)
- Charles I. Patterson Jr. (essay date 1974)
- Richard Hoffpauir (essay date 1976)
- Timothy Bahti (essay date 1981)
- John Beer (essay date 1985)
- Ken Frieden (essay date 1985)
- Stefan Ball (essay date 2001)
- Further Reading
- Copyright
