Criticism > Poetry > Kubla Khan, Samuel Taylor Coleridge - Charles I. Patterson Jr. (essay date 1974)
Kubla Khan, Samuel Taylor Coleridge - Charles I. Patterson Jr. (essay date 1974)
Charles I. Patterson Jr. (essay date 1974)
SOURCE: Patterson, Charles I., Jr. “The Daemonic in ‘Kubla Khan’: Toward Interpretation.” PMLA 89, no. 5 (October 1974): 1033-42.
[In the following essay, Patterson concentrates on the “daemonic” element in “Kubla Khan,” linking the work with a Platonic view of the inspired or “possessed” poet, which the critic contends is central to an interpretation of the poem.]
As is well known, there are strong differences of opinion concerning both what Coleridge's “Kubla Khan” expresses as a whole and the symbolic import of major elements within the poem. Perhaps no other poem of the time, not even Keats's Lamia, has evoked more widely diverging views of its meaning. Coleridge designated it a fragment in his prefatory statement, but critics differ just as frequently on whether or not it is a fragment as they do concerning its interpretation. Psychological analyses of...
[The entire page is 8651 words long]
Join eNotes
Over 3,500 study guides, question and answer forums, literature criticism, reference content, and much more!
Navigate
- Introduction
- Principal Works
-
Criticism
- Augustan Review (review date 1816)
- Scourge and Satirist (review date 1816)
- Thomas Moore (review date 1816)
- Monthly Review (review date 1817)
- John Livingston Lowes (essay date 1927)
- Harold Bloom (essay date 1961)
- Richard Gerber (essay date 1963)
- Irene H. Chayes (essay date 1966)
- George G. Watson (essay date 1966)
- Kenneth Burke (essay date 1966)
- Charles I. Patterson Jr. (essay date 1974)
- Richard Hoffpauir (essay date 1976)
- Timothy Bahti (essay date 1981)
- John Beer (essay date 1985)
- Ken Frieden (essay date 1985)
- Stefan Ball (essay date 2001)
- Further Reading
- Copyright
