An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge Group
Question:
Why is it significant that "circumstances of an imperious nature, which is unnecessary to relate here, had prevented him from taking service with...
the gallant army... and he chafed under the inglorious restraint, longing for the release of his energies, the larger life of the soldier, then opportunity for distinction." Look up the word "imperious" and note the multiple meanings. Do you think Bierce had a specific reason for this particular word choice? Evaluate.
Answers:
-
eNotes Editor
Posted by bullgatortail on Thursday October 8, 2009 at 6:39 PMBierce no doubt chose the word "imperious" with forethought, and it apparently describes Peyton Farquar accurately. Since imperious can be defined as "showing arrogant superiority" and disdain for those considered unworthy, these descriptions probably fit Farquar's opinion of Union soldiers and Union sympathizers living near his home in Northern Alabama. Imperious also denotes a regal standing, and as a plantation owner, Farquar probably also held that distinction.
As for "the inglorious restraint," it is obvious that Farquar wished to serve in the Confederate army, but he was instead convinced that his services would be more useful as a spy.

