Criticism > Nineteenth-Century Literary Criticism > Young Goodman Brown, Nathaniel Hawthorne - Harold F. Mosher, Jr. (essay date 1980)


Young Goodman Brown, Nathaniel Hawthorne - Harold F. Mosher, Jr. (essay date 1980)

Harold F. Mosher, Jr. (essay date 1980)

SOURCE: “The Sources of Ambiguity in Hawthorne's ‘Young Goodman Brown’: A Structuralist Approach,” in ESQ: A Journal of the American Renaissance, Vol. 26, No. 1, 1980, pp. 16-25.

[In the following essay, Mosher uses a structuralist critical approach to focus on contradictions in meaning and on the reader's relationship with the narrator in “Young Goodman Brown”.]

As Jonathan Culler has observed, the structuralist method, based on the linguistic model, should “account for our judgments about meaning and ambiguity, well-formedness and deviance.” The structuralist critic studies the conventions of any system that enables its signs to produce meaning or certain effects. He does not primarily study meaning or seek to formulate new interpretations; rather he examines how meaning or effects are achieved.1 In such analyses, of course, consideration of meaning cannot be ignored....

[The entire page is 6660 words long]

Join eNotes

The above is a free excerpt. Get total access to this content with the:

eNotes Pass