Criticism > Nineteenth-Century Literary Criticism > Schopenhauer, Arthur - Arthur O. Lovejoy (essay date 1911)
Schopenhauer, Arthur - Arthur O. Lovejoy (essay date 1911)
Arthur O. Lovejoy (essay date 1911)
SOURCE: "Schopenhauer as an Evolutionist," in The Monist, Vol. XXI, No. 2, 1911, pp. 195-222.
[In the following essay, Lovejoy contends that Schopenhauer, especially in his later writings, proposes doctrines akin to Darwin's evolution.]
The Absolute of the philosophy of Schopenhauer is notoriously one of the most complicated of all known products of metaphysical synthesis. Under the single, and in some cases highly inappropriate, name of "the Will" are merged into an ostensible identity conceptions of the most various character and the most diverse historic antecedents. The more important ingredients of the compound may fairly easily be enumerated. The Will is, in the first place, the Kantian "thing-in-itself," the residuum which is left after the object of knowledge has been robbed of all of the "subjective" forms of time and space and relatedness. It is also the Atman of the Vedantic monism, the...
[The entire page is 9283 words long]
Join eNotes
Over 3,500 study guides, question and answer forums, literature criticism, reference content, and much more!
Navigate
- Introduction
- Principal Works
-
Criticism
- John Oxenford (essay date 1853)
- Friedrich Nietzsche (essay date 1874)
- Friedrich Nietzsche (essay date 1887)
- H. N. Gardiner (essay date 1888)
- T. Bailey Saunders (essay date 1890)
- Josiah Royce (essay date 1892)
- William Caldwell (essay date 1896)
- Arthur O. Lovejoy (essay date 1911)
- Irwin Edman (essay date 1928)
- Thomas Mann (essay date 1939)
- Radoslav A. Tsanoff (essay date 1942)
- Bertrand Russell (essay date 1945)
- Frederick Copleston, S. J. (essay date 1946)
- John Bowle (essay date 1954)
- Georg Lukács (essay date 1954)
- Max Horkheimer (essay date 1960)
- Patrick Gardiner (essay date 1963)
- Paul Gottfried (essay date 1974)
- Further Reading
- Copyright
