Criticism > Nineteenth-Century Literary Criticism > Little Women - Carolyn G. Heilbrun (essay date 1982)
Little Women - Carolyn G. Heilbrun (essay date 1982)
Carolyn G. Heilbrun (essay date 1982)
SOURCE: "Louisa May Alcott: The Influence of Little Women," in Women, the Arts, and the 1920s in Paris and New York, edited by Kenneth W. Wheeler and Virginia Lee Lussier, Transaction Books, 1982, pp. 20-26.
[In the following essay, Heilbrun argues that Little Women's Jo has been a model of female autonomy for twentieth-century women artists.]
The influence of Little Women upon women artists in Paris between the wars is a matter of faith. As the Bible tells us, faith is the evidence of things not seen. If only Gertrude Stein had written of Jo March, or at least stopped into Sylvia Beach's bookshop and requested Little Women. What she requested, I am constrained by truth to report, is The Trail of the Lone some Pine and A Girl of the Limberlost.1 There is a reference to Alcott in Stein's writing, but not to Little Women. It is to Rose in...
[The entire page is 3139 words long]
Join eNotes
Over 3,500 study guides, question and answer forums, literature criticism, reference content, and much more!
Navigate
- Introduction
- Principal Works
-
Criticism
- Angela Brazil (review date 1922)
- Madeleine B. Stern (essay date 1943)
- Lavinia Russ (review date 1968)
- Kate Ellis (essay date 1977)
- Elizabeth Lennox Keyser (essay date 1982)
- Carolyn G. Heilbrun (essay date 1982)
- Nina Auerbach (essay date 1983)
- Anne Dalke (essay date 1985)
- Ruth K. MacDonald (essay date 1985)
- Sarah Elbert (essay date 1987)
- Beverly Lyon Clark (essay date 1989)
- Ellen Butler Donovan (essay date 1994)
- Christy Rishoi Minadeo (essay date 1994)
- Shirley Foster and Judy Simons (essay date 1995)
- Further Reading
- Copyright
