Criticism > Nineteenth-Century Literary Criticism > Little Dorrit, Charles Dickens - Sylvia Manning (essay date 1991)
Little Dorrit, Charles Dickens - Sylvia Manning (essay date 1991)
Sylvia Manning (essay date 1991)
SOURCE: Manning, Sylvia. “Social Criticism and Textual Subversion in Little Dorrit.” Dickens Studies Annual 20 (1991): 127-47.
[In the following essay, Manning examines the way Dickens undermines the narrator in Little Dorrit and the ideological contradictions that this causes.]
Little Dorrit proffers a deal of ideological discourse, some of it ironic explication in the service of the novel's satirical stance, such as the analysis of How Not To Do It, and some of it wholly solemn expostulation to the same moral purpose, such as the narrator's commentary on Little Dorrit's suggestion that, because her father has paid with his life, he should not also have to repay his debts in money. Apparently congruent with this discourse are the Christian ideology implicit in the tale and the ideology of the novel form itself, which is the epistemological ground for the moral implications.
...[The entire page is 9971 words long]
Join eNotes
Over 3,500 study guides, question and answer forums, literature criticism, reference content, and much more!
Navigate
- Introduction
- Principal Works
-
Criticism
- Robert Barnard (essay date 1971)
- Mike Hollington (essay date 1972)
- Avrom Fleishman (essay date 1974)
- Janice M. Carlisle (essay date 1975)
- Tom Linehan (essay date 1976)
- H. M. Page (essay date 1977)
- George Holoch (essay date 1978)
- Elaine Showalter (essay date 1979)
- Sarah Winter (essay date 1989)
- Nancy Aycock Metz (essay date 1990)
- Sylvia Manning (essay date 1991)
- Trey Philpotts (essay date 1991)
- Joss Lutz Marsh (essay date 1993)
- Dominic Rainsford (essay date 1995)
- Laura Peters (essay date 1995)
- Brian Rosenberg (essay date 1996)
- Mark M. Hennelly (essay date 1997)
- Rodney Stenning Edgecomb (essay date 1997)
- Further Reading
- Copyright
