Criticism > Nineteenth-Century Literary Criticism > Little Dorrit, Charles Dickens - Mark M. Hennelly (essay date 1997)
Little Dorrit, Charles Dickens - Mark M. Hennelly (essay date 1997)
Mark M. Hennelly (essay date 1997)
SOURCE: Hennelly, Mark M. “‘The Games of the Prison Children’ in Dickens's Little Dorrit.” Nineteenth-Century Contexts 20, no. 2 (1997): 187-213.
[In the following essay, Hennelly claims that games and play in Little Dorrit are not redemptive as they tend to be in Dickens's other works, suggesting that this is in keeping with the generally dark tone of the entire novel.]
When dealing with a work of art we must always bear in mind that art is a divine game. These two elements—the elements of the divine and that of the game—are equally important. It is divine because this is the element in man which comes nearest to God through becoming a true creator in his own right. And it is a game because it remains art only as long as we are allowed to remember that, after all, it is all make-believe, that … we are, as readers or spectators, participating in an elaborate and...
[The entire page is 14612 words long]
Join eNotes
Over 3,500 study guides, question and answer forums, literature criticism, reference content, and much more!
Navigate
- Introduction
- Principal Works
-
Criticism
- Robert Barnard (essay date 1971)
- Mike Hollington (essay date 1972)
- Avrom Fleishman (essay date 1974)
- Janice M. Carlisle (essay date 1975)
- Tom Linehan (essay date 1976)
- H. M. Page (essay date 1977)
- George Holoch (essay date 1978)
- Elaine Showalter (essay date 1979)
- Sarah Winter (essay date 1989)
- Nancy Aycock Metz (essay date 1990)
- Sylvia Manning (essay date 1991)
- Trey Philpotts (essay date 1991)
- Joss Lutz Marsh (essay date 1993)
- Dominic Rainsford (essay date 1995)
- Laura Peters (essay date 1995)
- Brian Rosenberg (essay date 1996)
- Mark M. Hennelly (essay date 1997)
- Rodney Stenning Edgecomb (essay date 1997)
- Further Reading
- Copyright
