Criticism > Nineteenth-Century Literary Criticism > Little Dorrit, Charles Dickens - H. M. Page (essay date 1977)
Little Dorrit, Charles Dickens - H. M. Page (essay date 1977)
H. M. Page (essay date 1977)
SOURCE: Page, H. M. “‘A More Seditious Book Than Das Kapital’: Shaw on Little Dorrit.” Shaw Review 21, no. 3 (September 1977): 171-77.
[In the following essay, Page discusses George Bernard Shaw's appraisal of Little Dorrit as a masterpiece, which inspired a marked change in the novel's evaluation by scholars.]
In the last century, most critics were indifferent or hostile to Little Dorrit, which was often regarded even by Dickens' admirers as the worst of his works. In contrast, since 1950 many critics have thought it a masterpiece, perhaps Dickens' greatest novel. A pioneer of this change of attitude was Shaw, who, at intervals throughout his long career, continued to insist on the profundity of Dickens' art in Little Dorrit, its truthfulness to human character, and its value as a portrayal of and revolt against the corrupt political and social system of the modern...
[The entire page is 3548 words long]
Join eNotes
Over 3,500 study guides, question and answer forums, literature criticism, reference content, and much more!
Navigate
- Introduction
- Principal Works
-
Criticism
- Robert Barnard (essay date 1971)
- Mike Hollington (essay date 1972)
- Avrom Fleishman (essay date 1974)
- Janice M. Carlisle (essay date 1975)
- Tom Linehan (essay date 1976)
- H. M. Page (essay date 1977)
- George Holoch (essay date 1978)
- Elaine Showalter (essay date 1979)
- Sarah Winter (essay date 1989)
- Nancy Aycock Metz (essay date 1990)
- Sylvia Manning (essay date 1991)
- Trey Philpotts (essay date 1991)
- Joss Lutz Marsh (essay date 1993)
- Dominic Rainsford (essay date 1995)
- Laura Peters (essay date 1995)
- Brian Rosenberg (essay date 1996)
- Mark M. Hennelly (essay date 1997)
- Rodney Stenning Edgecomb (essay date 1997)
- Further Reading
- Copyright
