Criticism > Nineteenth-Century Literary Criticism > Kubla Khan, Samuel Taylor Coleridge - H. R. Rookmaaker (essay date 1987)
Kubla Khan, Samuel Taylor Coleridge - H. R. Rookmaaker (essay date 1987)
H. R. Rookmaaker (essay date 1987)
SOURCE: “‘Kubla Khan’ in the Context of Coleridge's Writings Around 1802,” English Studies, Vol. 68, No. 3, June, 1987, pp. 228-35.
[In the following essay, Rookmaaker proposes that the key to understanding “Kubla Khan” may lie as much in Coleridge's other writing at the time he composed the poem as it does in its sources.]
Although most critics regard ‘Kubla Khan’ as one of the seminal poems of romanticism, there is sharp critical disagreement about its significance and meaning. While the general outlines of the landscape described in the poem are relatively clear, it offers only little indication concerning the significance of its imagery. The pleasure-dome, for instance, can be interpreted as a symbol of ‘the heaven of art’ (J. V. Baker), or as embodying finite man's ‘desire for pleasure and safety’ (R. H. Fogle); again, it could signify ‘the pleasure of a sexual union’...
[The entire page is 4251 words long]
Join eNotes
Over 3,500 study guides, question and answer forums, literature criticism, reference content, and much more!
Navigate
- Introduction
- Principal Works
-
Criticism
- Paul Magnuson (essay date 1974)
- Timothy Bahti (essay date 1981)
- Billie Burnett King (essay date 1981)
- Donald Pearce (essay date 1981)
- Edward Strickland (essay date 1981)
- Stephen Tapscott (essay date 1981)
- Anthony John Harding (essay date 1982)
- Michael Bright (essay date 1984)
- John Beer (essay date 1985)
- Cyrus Hamlin (essay date 1985)
- Fred L. Milne (essay date 1986)
- H. R. Rookmaaker (essay date 1987)
- Regina Hewitt (essay date 1988)
- David Perkins (essay date 1990)
- Kathleen Wheeler (essay date 1991)
- L. R. Kennard (essay date 1995)
- David Chandler (essay date 1998)
- Douglas Hedley (essay date 1998)
- Further Reading
- Copyright
