Criticism > Nineteenth-Century Literary Criticism > Kubla Khan, Samuel Taylor Coleridge - David Perkins (essay date 1990)
Kubla Khan, Samuel Taylor Coleridge - David Perkins (essay date 1990)
David Perkins (essay date 1990)
SOURCE: “The Imaginative Vision of Kubla Khan On Coleridge's Introductory Note” in Coleridge, Keats, and the Imagination: Romanticism and Adam's Dream, edited by J. Robert Barth and John L. Mahoney, University of Missouri Press, 1990, pp. 97-108.
[In the following essay, Perkins discusses the importance of the introductory note to “Kubla Khan,” noting that it guides the reader's interpretation of the work from start to finish.]
Coleridge's introductory note to Kubla Khan weaves together two myths with potent imaginative appeal. The myth of the lost poem tells how an inspired work was mysteriously given to the poet and then dispelled irrecoverably. The nonexistent lines haunt the imagination more than any actual poem could. John Livingston Lowes used to tell his classes, W. Jackson Bate remembers, “If there is any man in the history of literature who should be hanged, drawn, and...
[The entire page is 6018 words long]
Join eNotes
Over 3,500 study guides, question and answer forums, literature criticism, reference content, and much more!
Navigate
- Introduction
- Principal Works
-
Criticism
- Paul Magnuson (essay date 1974)
- Timothy Bahti (essay date 1981)
- Billie Burnett King (essay date 1981)
- Donald Pearce (essay date 1981)
- Edward Strickland (essay date 1981)
- Stephen Tapscott (essay date 1981)
- Anthony John Harding (essay date 1982)
- Michael Bright (essay date 1984)
- John Beer (essay date 1985)
- Cyrus Hamlin (essay date 1985)
- Fred L. Milne (essay date 1986)
- H. R. Rookmaaker (essay date 1987)
- Regina Hewitt (essay date 1988)
- David Perkins (essay date 1990)
- Kathleen Wheeler (essay date 1991)
- L. R. Kennard (essay date 1995)
- David Chandler (essay date 1998)
- Douglas Hedley (essay date 1998)
- Further Reading
- Copyright
