Criticism > Nineteenth-Century Literary Criticism > Hyperion, John Keats - Bruce E. Miller (essay date 1965)
Hyperion, John Keats - Bruce E. Miller (essay date 1965)
Bruce E. Miller (essay date 1965)
SOURCE: Miller, Bruce E. “On the Incompleteness of Keats's Hyperion.” College Language Association Journal 8, no. 3 (March 1965): 234-39.
[In the following essay, Miller asserts that Keats left Hyperion incomplete because he could not resolve the philosophical dilemma created through his profession that the world will inherently improve over time and his uncertainty regarding universal fate and individual will.]
Scholars have asked why Keats did not finish a poem which begins as prosperously as Hyperion. As for explanations, Thorpe has indicated the possibility that Keats' love affair may have interfered with work on a heroic poem;1 Colvin has suggested that Keats' sympathetic portrayal of the goodness and beauty of the Titans was so fine that he found he could not go on to express adequately the surpassing excellence of the Olympians, as the plan of the poem to be...
[The entire page is 2393 words long]
Join eNotes
Over 3,500 study guides, question and answer forums, literature criticism, reference content, and much more!
Navigate
- Introduction
- Principal Works
-
Criticism
- Bruce E. Miller (essay date 1965)
- Irene H. Chayers (essay date 1967)
- Paul D. Sheats (essay date 1968)
- Stuart M. Sperry (essay date 1975)
- Paul Sherwin (essay date 1978)
- Anya Taylor (essay date 1979)
- Warren U. Ober and W. K. Thomas (essay date 1980)
- Alan J. Bewell (essay date 1986)
- Carol L. Bernstein (essay date 1990)
- Marlon B. Ross (essay date 1990)
- Jonathan Bate (essay date 1992)
- Carl Plasa (essay date 1995)
- Joel Faflak (essay date 1998)
- Christoph Bode (essay date 2000)
- Ellen Brinks (essay date 2000)
- Brian Goldberg (essay date 2000)
- Further Reading
- Copyright
