Home > Neoclassicism Summary & Study Guide > Essays and Criticism > Critical Opinions on the Definition of Neoclassicism
Neoclassicism | Critical Opinions on the Definition of Neoclassicism
Kryhoski is currently employed as a freelance writer. In this essay, Kryhoski considers critical opinions on the definition of Neoclassicism.
The boundaries defining the neoclassical genre have been tested, questioned, and found wanting by many literary critics. Equally troublesome to many of these critics is the notion that a literary canon can be categorized strictly on the basis of what is a largely accepted, though narrowly focused. In the late 1960s, James William Johnson considered this idea in his work “What Was Neoclassicism.” He was chiefly concerned with what he identified as a vast range of literature widely ignored in favor of a “limited, prejudged selection of Restoration and 18th Century literature.”...
[The entire page is 1362 words long]
Join eNotes
The above is a free excerpt. Get total access to this content with the:
Summary and Analysis – Themes – Characters – And much more...
Join eNotes
Over 3,500 study guides, question and answer forums, literature criticism, reference content, and much more!
Navigate
- Neoclassicism: Introduction
- Neoclassicism: Representative Authors
- Neoclassicism: Representative Works
- Neoclassicism: Themes
- Neoclassicism: Style
- Neoclassicism: Movement Variations
- Neoclassicism: Historical Context
- Neoclassicism: Critical Overview
- Neoclassicism: Essays and Criticism
- Neoclassicism: Compare and Contrast
- Neoclassicism: Topics for Further Study
- Neoclassicism: Media Adaptations
- Neoclassicism: What Do I Read Next?
- Neoclassicism: Bibliography and Further Reading
- Neoclassicism: Pictures
- Copyright
Tell a friend about Neoclassicism at eNotes.
