Browse all Journals & Periodicals

Moral icons: a comment on Steven Lubet's reconstructing Atticus Finch.

Publisher Michigan Law Review Association
Publication Michigan Law Review
Subject Law
Format Magazine/Journal
ISSN 0026-2234
Issues per Year 8
Volume 97
Issue 6
Published 1999-05-01

Role Type Name
Person Criticism and interpretation Steven Lubet
Author n/a William H. Simon

Related Content Type
To Kill a Mockingbird Lesson Plan
To Kill a Mockingbird eNotes
To Kill a Mockingbird quickNotes
To Kill a Mockingbird Puzzle Pack
To Kill a Mockingbird Activity Pack
To Kill a Mockingbird AP Teaching Unit
To Kill a Mockingbird Multiple Perspectives
To Kill a Mockingbird Power Pack
To Kill a Mockingbird Teaching Unit
To Kill a Mockingbird Response Journal
To Kill a Mockingbird Vocabulary from Literature
To Kill a Mockingbird Salem on Literature

Atticus Finch's conduct would have been justified by the bar's conventional norms even if he had known Tom Robinson to be guilty. That fact, however, is not the source of the admiration for him that To Kill a Mockingbird has induced in so many readers. That admiration depends on the clear premise of the novel that Finch plausibly believes that Tom Robinson is innocent. Thus, the bar's invocation of Finch as a sympathetic illustration of its norms is misleading. The ethics of the novel are quite different from those of the bar.

Steven Lubet does a good job of showing that the...

[This journal article is 762 words long]

Join eNotes

The above is a free excerpt. Get complete access to our library of journals with the:

Lookup any word on eNotes with our dictionary. Highlight the word and press SHIFT + D for a definition, or SHIFT + T for a synonym.