Iraq | The War Proves the Need for United Nations' Involvement in World Conflicts
About the Author: Brian Urquhart is a former
undersecretary general of the United Nations. He has
written several books on international relations, inrfudmg-
Decolonization and World Peace.
Within the UN [United Nations], the end of
the cold war has had its most immediate effect
on the work of the Security Council. The Council
has been able to make notable progress in peacemaking
and peace-keeping tasks that had languished
during the cold war—for example, in
Namibia, Afghanistan, the Iran-Iraq War, Cambodia,
Central...
[The entire page is 4801 words long]
Navigate
- Introduction
-
Prelude to the Gulf War: Is Military Action Justified?
- Military Action Is Justified
- Defending America's Oil Supply Justifies Military Action
- Ending Iraqi Atrocities in Kuwait Justifies Military Action
- Destroying Iraq's Nuclear Capability Justifies Military Action
- The Failure of Economic Sanctions Justifies Military Action
- Military Action Is Moral
- Military Action Is Not Justified
- Military Action Is Immoral
- Defending America's Oil Supply Does Not Justify Military Action
- Liberating Kuwait Does Not Justify Military Action
- Destroying Iraq's Nuclear Capability Does Not Justify Military Action
- Maintaining Economic Sanctions May Prevent the Need for Military Action
- Did the Persian Gulf War Strengthen the U.S.?
-
What Are the Military Lessons of the Persian Gulf War?
- Chapter 3 Preface
- The War Proves the Need for a Strong Military
- The War Proves the Importance of International Military Cooperation
- The War Proves the Need for United Nations' Involvement in World Conflicts
- The War Proves the Need for a U.S. Military Presence in the Gulf
- Does Not Prove the Need for a Strong Military
- The War Proves the Need to Seek Political Alternatives to Military Force
- The War Proves Military Force Cannot Solve International Problems
- The War Proves the Need to End Arms Sales to the Middle East
Tell a friend about Iraq at eNotes.
