Iraq | Destroying Iraq's Nuclear Capability Does Not Justify Military Action
About the Authors: David Albright is a senior scientist
at Friends of the Earth, an environmental organization
in Washington, D. C. Mark Hibbs is European
editor of Nuclear Fuel and Nucleonics Week
in Bonn, Germany. The following article was written
in March 1991.
Just two hours after U.S. warplanes began attacking
Iraq on January 16, 1991, President
George Bush went on national television to report
the goals of the assault. "As I report to you,
air attacks are under way against military targets
in Iraq. We are determined...
[The entire page is 5259 words long]
Navigate
- Introduction
-
Prelude to the Gulf War: Is Military Action Justified?
- Military Action Is Justified
- Defending America's Oil Supply Justifies Military Action
- Ending Iraqi Atrocities in Kuwait Justifies Military Action
- Destroying Iraq's Nuclear Capability Justifies Military Action
- The Failure of Economic Sanctions Justifies Military Action
- Military Action Is Moral
- Military Action Is Not Justified
- Military Action Is Immoral
- Defending America's Oil Supply Does Not Justify Military Action
- Liberating Kuwait Does Not Justify Military Action
- Destroying Iraq's Nuclear Capability Does Not Justify Military Action
- Maintaining Economic Sanctions May Prevent the Need for Military Action
- Did the Persian Gulf War Strengthen the U.S.?
-
What Are the Military Lessons of the Persian Gulf War?
- Chapter 3 Preface
- The War Proves the Need for a Strong Military
- The War Proves the Importance of International Military Cooperation
- The War Proves the Need for United Nations' Involvement in World Conflicts
- The War Proves the Need for a U.S. Military Presence in the Gulf
- Does Not Prove the Need for a Strong Military
- The War Proves the Need to Seek Political Alternatives to Military Force
- The War Proves Military Force Cannot Solve International Problems
- The War Proves the Need to End Arms Sales to the Middle East
Tell a friend about Iraq at eNotes.
