Iraq | Defending America's Oil Supply Justifies Military Action
About the Author: Karen Elliott House is vice
president, international, of Dow Jones & Company,
the publisher of the Wall Street Journal, from which
this viewpoint is taken. The article was written one
week after Iraq invaded Kuwait.
The world changed last week. A grandiose
Middle East dictator took control—not just of a
neighboring sheikdom, but of the West's economic
destiny in the 1990s.
Saddam Hussein, an insular leader who has
had almost no contact with the Western world,
nonetheless appears to...
[The entire page is 2305 words long]
Navigate
- Introduction
-
Prelude to the Gulf War: Is Military Action Justified?
- Military Action Is Justified
- Defending America's Oil Supply Justifies Military Action
- Ending Iraqi Atrocities in Kuwait Justifies Military Action
- Destroying Iraq's Nuclear Capability Justifies Military Action
- The Failure of Economic Sanctions Justifies Military Action
- Military Action Is Moral
- Military Action Is Not Justified
- Military Action Is Immoral
- Defending America's Oil Supply Does Not Justify Military Action
- Liberating Kuwait Does Not Justify Military Action
- Destroying Iraq's Nuclear Capability Does Not Justify Military Action
- Maintaining Economic Sanctions May Prevent the Need for Military Action
- Did the Persian Gulf War Strengthen the U.S.?
-
What Are the Military Lessons of the Persian Gulf War?
- Chapter 3 Preface
- The War Proves the Need for a Strong Military
- The War Proves the Importance of International Military Cooperation
- The War Proves the Need for United Nations' Involvement in World Conflicts
- The War Proves the Need for a U.S. Military Presence in the Gulf
- Does Not Prove the Need for a Strong Military
- The War Proves the Need to Seek Political Alternatives to Military Force
- The War Proves Military Force Cannot Solve International Problems
- The War Proves the Need to End Arms Sales to the Middle East
Tell a friend about Iraq at eNotes.
