Iraq | Defending America's Oil Supply Does Not Justify Military Action
About the Author: David R. Henderson, an associate
professor of economics at the Naval Postgraduate
School in Monterey, California, was a senior energy
economist during the Reagan administration. This article
was written in October 1990.
President Saddam Hussein of Iraq has no
qualms about torturing or even murdering innocent
people. If he should manage to hold on to
Kuwait and to capture Saudi Arabia, he would
have access to even greater wealth than he has in
Iraq. No doubt, he would attempt to use that
wealth to...
[The entire page is 2116 words long]
Navigate
- Introduction
-
Prelude to the Gulf War: Is Military Action Justified?
- Military Action Is Justified
- Defending America's Oil Supply Justifies Military Action
- Ending Iraqi Atrocities in Kuwait Justifies Military Action
- Destroying Iraq's Nuclear Capability Justifies Military Action
- The Failure of Economic Sanctions Justifies Military Action
- Military Action Is Moral
- Military Action Is Not Justified
- Military Action Is Immoral
- Defending America's Oil Supply Does Not Justify Military Action
- Liberating Kuwait Does Not Justify Military Action
- Destroying Iraq's Nuclear Capability Does Not Justify Military Action
- Maintaining Economic Sanctions May Prevent the Need for Military Action
- Did the Persian Gulf War Strengthen the U.S.?
-
What Are the Military Lessons of the Persian Gulf War?
- Chapter 3 Preface
- The War Proves the Need for a Strong Military
- The War Proves the Importance of International Military Cooperation
- The War Proves the Need for United Nations' Involvement in World Conflicts
- The War Proves the Need for a U.S. Military Presence in the Gulf
- Does Not Prove the Need for a Strong Military
- The War Proves the Need to Seek Political Alternatives to Military Force
- The War Proves Military Force Cannot Solve International Problems
- The War Proves the Need to End Arms Sales to the Middle East
Tell a friend about Iraq at eNotes.
