Home > Inadmissible Evidence Summary & Study Guide > Essays and Criticism > Review by John Gassner
Inadmissible Evidence | Review by John Gassner
In the following review, Gassner asserts that Osborne’s main character in Inadmissible Evidence is “mediocre,” expresses himself minimally and with total indifference to others. He also reproaches Osborne’s writing as lacking insight and feeling.
On Broadway, as has been recently the case with embarrassing frequency, the most distinguished productions were of European, mainly English, provenance—most notably Peter Weiss’s Marat/Sade, Peter Shaffer’s The Royal Hunt of the Sun, John Osborne’s Inadmissible Evidence, and John Whiting’s The Devils . . .
Concerning Inadmissible Evidence, much as one may be grateful for seeing another play by this gifted writer, I can only wonder whether, so to speak, Osborne’s ingenious game is worth the candle. The game includes such departures...
[The entire page is 996 words long]
Join eNotes
The above is a free excerpt. Get total access to this content with the:
Summary and Analysis – Themes – Characters – And much more...
Join eNotes
Over 3,500 study guides, question and answer forums, literature criticism, reference content, and much more!
Navigate
- Inadmissible Evidence: Introduction
- Inadmissible Evidence: Summary
- Inadmissible Evidence: John Osborne Biography
- Inadmissible Evidence: Characters
- Inadmissible Evidence: Themes
- Inadmissible Evidence: Style
- Inadmissible Evidence: Historical Context
- Inadmissible Evidence: Critical Overview
- Inadmissible Evidence: Essays and Criticism
- Inadmissible Evidence: Compare and Contrast
- Inadmissible Evidence: Topics for Further Study
- Inadmissible Evidence: Media Adaptations
- Inadmissible Evidence: What Do I Read Next?
- Inadmissible Evidence: Bibliography and Further Reading
- Inadmissible Evidence: Pictures
- Copyright
Tell a friend about Inadmissible Evidence at eNotes.
