Immigration
Immigration | Naturalization and Birthright Citizenship Should Be Encouraged
Immigrant naturalization and birthright citizenship should be supported, asserts John S. Cummins in the following viewpoint. The vast majority of immigrants in the United States are moral, productive individuals who are eager to become naturalized citizens. Any legislative proposals that would change the naturalization process should not be designed in a way that would make it more difficult for immigrants to become citizens, he contends. For example, birthright citizenship—which grants citizenship to all children born in the United States regardless of the status of their parents...
[The entire page is 1382 words long]
Navigate
- Introduction
-
Historical Debate: Should Immigration Be Restricted?
- Chapter 1 Preface
- America Should Welcome Immigration (1845)
- America Should Discourage Immigration (1849)
- Restrictions on Immigration Are Necessary (1913)
- Restrictions on Immigration Are Not Necessary (1912)
- National Origins Quotas Should Be Abolished (1963)
- National Origins Quotas Should Be Retained (1964)
- Is Immigration a Serious Problem?
- How Should the United States Address Illegal Immigration?
-
How Should U.S. Immigration Policy Be Reformed?
- Chapter 4 Preface
- Immigration Should Be Restricted
- Immigration Should Not Be Restricted
- The United States Must Restrict Immigration to Prevent Terrorism
- Restricting Immigration Would Not Prevent Terrorism
- The U.S. Government Should Discourage Dual Citizenship
- Dual Citizenship Is Not a Threat to the United States
- Birthright Citizenship Should Be Repealed
- Naturalization and Birthright Citizenship Should Be Encouraged
- Dual Citizenship Is Not a Threat to the United States
- For Further Discussion
- Organizations to Contact
- Bibliography
- Copyright
Tell a friend about Immigration at eNotes.
