Worst Book-to-Film?  C'mon, worst lists are always more fun than best lists.... Every time a book is adapted to film, there will be critics. Of course, the film maker cannot bring everything to...

Worst Book-to-Film?

 C'mon, worst lists are always more fun than best lists....

Every time a book is adapted to film, there will be critics. Of course, the film maker cannot bring everything to the screen that fills the novel, but some books translate better than others.  Some should probably never be attempted.

Who is your nominee for worst book-to-film adaptation?

Asked on

38 Answers | Add Yours

accessteacher's profile pic

Posted on

How about Possession by A. S. Byatt? The film version completely robbed the original of its intellectual depth and fascination. I also agree that The Scarlet Letter was a definite flop. I did actually quite like the Twilight film though!

mshurn's profile pic

Posted on

Reaching back into the past, I would have to nominate The Great Gatsby with Robert Redford and Mia Farrow. Fitzgerald's work doesn't film well anyway, since his prose is so poetic and so much of the action is internal, but Gatsby the Movie was awful! The dialog sounded so artificial and stilted, Robert Redford looked confused throughout, and I kept expecting Mia Farrow's wig to fall off. The only way to enjoy watching this movie would be to turn off the sound and look at the pictures.

dswain001's profile pic

Posted on

As a Twilight fan, I must say the movie did the book no justice. Certain things were left out that I think shouldn't have. For example, the incident with the blood testing in science class. Harry Potter also. The director of the first film did his best to stay very true to the novel. But each film after that has strayed further and further away.

robertwilliam's profile pic

Posted on

At #25, I think all of Zeffirelli's Shakespeare films are painfully bad and dull. Taming of the Shrew, Hamlet (with Mel Gibson!!) and the interminable camp, trite, faux-Italian but still very repressed-English Romeo and Juliet. For my money, burn them all- I reckon they've put more kids off Shakespeare than anything else!

I don't think either adaptation of "Lolita" works particularly well as a version of the book. But Kubrick's is brilliant as a film in its own right - the Jeremy Irons version isn't.

I think that the Al Pacino version of "The Merchant of Venice" takes the award for me though. Passionless, self-indulgent, slooooo-oooooow speaking, and a film that makes the idea of spending three hours painting a wall and watching it dry seem attractive. Spare us.

writergal06's profile pic

Posted on

Beowulf is at the top of my list. My students know that just mentioning the movie will elicit at least a ten minute rant. I wasn't a big fan of The Golden Compass either. The changes made for the movie seemed to me to remove all the suspense. I felt the movie was very anti-climatic.

lynn30k's profile pic

Posted on

To #25--no, the Zefirelli film was well cast. I'm thinking of the 1936 version, starring 43 year old Leslie Howard as Romeo, playing off of Norma Shearer's 34 year old Juliet.

jilllessa's profile pic

Posted on

I would have to agree with # 6 that Beowulf was one of  the worst book to film creations that there ever was.  As a medievalist, I was appalled.  As a science fiction fan, I would have to say that both Dune and Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy were dismal failures as well.

linda-allen's profile pic

Posted on

The World According to Garp....really, any Irving novel that has become a movie....there is so much complexity to all of his novels that a movie can't do them justice.

No, not Garp--Hotel New Hampshire. Are they really bad movies, or are the books overrated too?

litchick2011's profile pic

Posted on

Any of the early versions of Romeo and Juliet--the actors were about 20 years too old.

Kid books sometimes don't translate very well--anyone see Pippi Longstocking?

And yes, that Scarlet Letter was AWFUL.

Hopefully you don't mean the 1968 Zeffirelli. The main actors were both in their teens - Olivia Hussey (Juliet) was 16 or 17, and Leonard Whiting (Romeo) was 18 or 19.

cmcqueeney's profile pic

Posted on

The Scarlet Letter with Demi Moore.  Talk about creative license!  UGH! 

Another one is Beowulf with Angelina Jolie.  Half the stuff never even happened, and "Grendel's" gold costume is a little too much.

 

I agree about the Scarlet Letter!

alexb2's profile pic

Posted on

Call of the Wild has to be my pick. The story doesn't translate well from the dog's mind to man's. We see the whole Jack London story from the eyes of Buck, and then the movie turns it around and ruins the perspective. It's like they tried, they just couldn't pull it off.

Call of the Wild may not have been any good, but Into the Wild was great!

engtchr5's profile pic

Posted on

Call of the Wild has to be my pick. The story doesn't translate well from the dog's mind to man's. We see the whole Jack London story from the eyes of Buck, and then the movie turns it around and ruins the perspective. It's like they tried, they just couldn't pull it off.

sfwriter's profile pic

Posted on

Worst Book-to-Film?

C'mon, worst lists are always more fun than best lists....

Every time a book is adapted to film, there will be critics. Of course, the film maker cannot bring everything to the screen that fills the novel, but some books translate better than others.  Some should probably never be attempted.

Who is your nominee for worst book-to-film adaptation?

  Great topic.  While I agree with almost all of the posts about turkey-movies from much better books (except I thought Catch-22 wasn't all that bad) but one of the worst, all time, has got to be Possession.  They took a Booker Prize winner and put Gwyneth Paltrow in it (who might have physically resembled Maud, but that was all), and Aaron Eckart was disastrous (and innacurate) as Roland.  Not even the very good actors Jeremy Northam and Jennifer Ehle could save it.  It was a yawn-fest, while the book was completely engrossing and delightful.

litchick2011's profile pic

Posted on

The World According to Garp....really, any Irving novel that has become a movie....there is so much complexity to all of his novels that a movie can't do them justice.

Showing 1–15 of 38

We’ve answered 319,822 questions. We can answer yours, too.

Ask a question