2 Answers | Add Yours
In addition to the strategic events outlined above to consider the battle a turning point, the Battle of Gettysburg was both a tactical and moral defeat for Lee and the Army of Northern Virginia. When Lee's army retreated from Maryland, it had suffered not only a loss in irreplaceable personnel but, perhaps more important, a loss in its sense of invincibility.
Up until the Battle of Gettysburg, Lee (and his troops) believed that his troops could--under almost any circumstances--defeat the Army of the Potomac. The Army of Northern Virginia, up to that point, had rarely been defeated in a strategic (its overall goals) or tactical (its fighting capability) sense. In fact, one could argue that the Confederate Army under Lee had yet to be completely beaten in a major battle up to July 3, 1864.
Lee's army, therefore, firmly believed that if they encountered the Federals on roughly equal terms they would win. The Battle of Gettysburg, which resulted in very similar casualties on both sides, proved to Lee and his army that the Federal army was willing to incur any level of losses in order to stop the Confederates, and this realization provided a psychological shock to the Confederates--an important turning point in their belief in their invincibility.
When the Army of Northern Virginia retreated into Virgina in the days following the battle, it left Gettysburg with the awareness that it had been beaten. Although many historians argue that the battle was a tactical draw, most consider it a strategic and psychological defeat for the Confederates.
There are a few main reasons why the Battle of Gettysburg is typically seen as a major turning point in the Civil War.
First, it was a turning point because it did away with any thoughts that President Lincoln might have had about making peace with the South. The Confederate vice president was, as the battle was raging, heading for Washington, D.C. to talk with the US government and peace might have been proposed. However, when Lincoln heard of the victory, he refused to let the vice president come to Washington.
Second, and more importantly, the battle convinced European countries not to get involved. If a major European power such as England had recognized the Confederacy or, even worse, started to help the CSA militarily, the strategic picture would have been greatly altered and the US might have had to make peace.
Finally, this battle was seen as the first major defeat of Gen. Robert E. Lee. Up until that time, he was seen by many in the North and South as invincible. His defeat was good for morale in the North and helped convince the North that the war could be won.
We’ve answered 327,986 questions. We can answer yours, too.Ask a question