Homework Help

In Rebecca by Daphne Du Maurier, why does the narrator-heroine remain nameless and is...

user profile pic

mjay25 | Student, Graduate | (Level 1) Valedictorian

Posted February 28, 2012 at 7:18 AM via web

dislike 2 like

In Rebecca by Daphne Du Maurier, why does the narrator-heroine remain nameless and is this namelessness symbolic in anyway?

2 Answers | Add Yours

user profile pic

kiwi | High School Teacher | (Level 3) Educator

Posted February 28, 2012 at 11:09 AM (Answer #1)

dislike 2 like

The narrator remains nameless for several reasons. Firstly, she is not the most important female in the text: that is of course the sinister presence of Rebecca.

As a young companion to Mrs Van Hopper, the narrator has no identity. She lives in the shadow of her boorish employer and is criticized for any opinion which may deviate from that of her boss. When Maxim de Winter joins them for coffee, the narrator is keenly aware of her place:

 I was a youthful thing and unimportant, and [that[ there was no need to include me in the conversation.

Maxim loves her regardless of her background, name, past or present. She is loved by him for her innocence, and her name is something that they seem to share, but no-one else-

 You have a very lovely and unusual name.

She is pleased that he spells it correctly, although as reader we are not privy to the secret, as if this is the identity she has only when with Maxim.

Once they are married, the narrator becomes Mrs de Winter. She is not comfortable with the title at first – a feeling which is reinforced cruelly by Rebecca’s former maid and housekeeper, Mrs Danvers. After the narrator’s foolishness in hiding the broken ornament is revealed, Mrs Danvers gloats in the narrator’s anxiety-

There was no-one I could trust. When Mrs de Winter was alive we used to do the valuables together.

The purpose of the story is to find the truth about Rebecca and her influence on Maxim. The narrator is more of a foil to the “damnable” Rebecca-

 The jig-saw pieces came together piece by piece, and the real Rebecca took shape and form before me, stepping from her shadow world like a living figure from a picture frame.

The final reason the narrator is not named also gives us a perspective into the anonymous lives that women led when the novel is set. The narrator only becomes identifiable by the title bestowed by marriage. It is the male line which is important. This is, of course, what causes Maxim to put up with Rebecca’s outlandish behaviour: he does not want the scandal linked to his family name.

Sources:

user profile pic

booboosmoosh | High School Teacher | (Level 3) Educator Emeritus

Posted February 28, 2012 at 1:29 PM (Answer #2)

dislike 2 like

In Daphne Du Maurier's Rebecca, the narrator remains nameless in order to convey the overpowering essence of Rebecca, Maxim's dead wife and former mistress of Manderley; and to display without question the narrator's complete lack of power in her new home.

When she becomes Maxim de Winter's second wife, she believes that she will become the mistress of his home: not in a way that she will command others, but that she will bring their home to life, resurrecting joy and pleasure to her new husband's life. (She has no way of knowing that these things were not present when Rebecca was alive: his life was a living hell.) However, even the house seems to conspire against her fondest desire—it is as unwelcoming as a jealous woman:

There was Manderley, our Manderley, secretive and silent as it had always been...As I stood there, hushed and still, I could swear that the house was not an empty shell but lived and breathed as it had lived before...

While Maxim seems to love his new wife, he is somewhat distracted and never seems to notice when Mrs. Danvers (the housekeeper who was dedicated to—obsessed with—Rebecca) treats her as a non-person, which promotes the sense that the narrator is an outsider:

"I shan't want to make any changes." I stopped, a little breathless, still uncertain of myself and whether I was saying the right thing.

Mrs. Danvers does nothing to alleviate the narrator's nervousness or desire to avoid disrupting the household.

"Very good," she said; "I hope I shall do everything to your satisfaction. The house has been in my charge now for more than a year, and Mr. De Winter has never complained."

Mrs. Danvers rubs the narrator's face in her "alien status:"

"It was very different when the late Mrs. de Winter was alive...and though I managed for her, she liked to supervise things herself."

This is the housekeeper's way of demonstrating the power Rebecca had and the power Mrs. Danvers has, inferring that the narrator has no power, even though Rebecca is dead.

Once again I had the impression that she chose her words with care, that she was feeling her way, as it were, into my mind, and watching for the effect upon my face...into her face came the same expression I had noticed before, when I first had shaken hands with her in the hall, a look surely of derision, of definite contempt.

The narrator does not give her own name, and Maxim refers to her with endearments. Mrs. Danvers does nothing to recognize the narrator as a person of worth. In this way, Danvers makes the narrator feel weak, small and invisible. Danvers easily manipulates the new wife. In this way, Danvers keeps the poisonous atmosphere that Rebecca created in their home thriving, like a living thing. It drives a wedge between the newlyweds, and feeds Danvers desire to see the new Mrs. de Winter thrive.

The narrator is unnamed as if she were unimportant and not worthy of Danver's notice—as she keeps the memory of the dead Rebecca alive, still wreaking havoc in her wake as if she had never passed away.

Sources:

Join to answer this question

Join a community of thousands of dedicated teachers and students.

Join eNotes