Better Students Ask More Questions.
Why does the Mariner kill the albatross? What is the symbolic nature of the action?
5 Answers | add yours
High School Teacher
The Mariner kills the albatross because he associated the lack of wind with it. At first all the men thought the bird was good luck since a good wind blew and they moved swiftly. Then, the wind died and they blamed the bird. THe sailors cheered when the Mariner killed the bird which is symbolic of animal abuse. By killing the bird, he is disrespecting all of nature--a sin since the poem states: all creatures great and small the lord God created them all.
Once the Mariner "blesses the snake unaware," then he begins the long trek back to being forgiven and living out the rest of his life wandering the earth and teaching others how to treat mother nature and all her creatures.
Posted by amy-lepore on April 4, 2008 at 2:29 AM (Answer #1)
Although critical to advancing the story, killing the albatross isn't really central to it; it's what follows. The killing was an impulsive act by a sailor who doesn't appreciate "all things great and small." He kills it because he can. Animals don't matter. What happens after killing the bird is what is important. Ultimately he suffers the consequences of indiscriminately killing the bird; his mates perish and he is condemned to wander the earth telling his tale. He also learns that he must love all god's creatures, etc. My question is why his mates perish and he doesn't. If I were one, I'd say, "Hey jerk, you die and I'll wander the earth telling your tale!"
Posted by thedra on July 18, 2008 at 12:27 AM (Answer #2)
eNoter, Dean's List
the mariner kills the albatrooss for no apparent reason; he might have thought the albatross was bad luck. the bird is symbolic of nature which the mariner had no respect for when he shot it.
Posted by admc on July 19, 2008 at 3:56 AM (Answer #3)
I think he killed it because he wanted to gain notice .He felt that his crewmen thought that the bird was the leading power in that vast ocean.The bird took the position of the mariner, and the mariner was angry to see ,what he considered a silly creature, take his place as a leader of the ship.
Posted by umnmun on December 17, 2011 at 1:02 AM (Answer #4)
High School Teacher
The killing is definetely no 'impulsive act'.
Look up for cross (mention the symbolysm, by the way...)-bows. At the supposed timeset for the journey (at about 1500) simple shotguns were already invented. Moreover, the act of loading a cross-bow needs strength and time as it never has been carried loaded.
I wouldn't agree with amy-lepore, because the mariner was blessed as well as punished by the other seamen for killing the bird.
So I agree with thedra: killing the bird isn't central; it's what follows (even if birds are creatures who -by nature ;-) - live between earth and heaven).
But what follows isn't a 'godly punishment'. No. Nature is spiritualised before 'God' comes into play.
Does 'nature' punish the mariner? Does 'God' punish him? Does he punish himself?
To answer your question: the symbolic nature of the action is that one could regret what one has done before.
Posted by hessenbub on January 17, 2012 at 2:17 AM (Answer #5)
Related QuestionsSee all »
Join to answer this question
Join a community of thousands of dedicated teachers and students.