Homework Help

Why did the majority of the Court reject the trespass doctrine in Katz v. U.S.?

user profile pic

lisamarie79 | Student, College Freshman | (Level 3) eNoter

Posted January 24, 2012 at 6:58 AM via web

dislike 1 like

Why did the majority of the Court reject the trespass doctrine in Katz v. U.S.?

1 Answer | Add Yours

user profile pic

pohnpei397 | College Teacher | (Level 3) Distinguished Educator

Posted January 24, 2012 at 8:12 AM (Answer #1)

dislike 2 like

The majority of the Court rejected the trespass doctrine that had been enunciated in Olmstead because they felt that a more expansive vision of the 4th Amendment was warranted.  They felt that the 4th Amendment is meant to protect people from unreasonable searches and seizures.  This contrasts with the doctrine from Olmstead in which the Court held that it was places such as homes that were protected by the 4th Amendment.  The Court held in Katz that the 4th Amendment was meant to allow people to protect their privacy whenever they were in a place (like a phone booth) in which they had a reasonable expectation of privacy.

Join to answer this question

Join a community of thousands of dedicated teachers and students.

Join eNotes