Homework Help

Who was Godot in the play Waiting for Godot?

user profile pic

jawahar | Student, Undergraduate | eNotes Newbie

Posted February 4, 2010 at 7:13 PM via web

dislike 3 like

Who was Godot in the play Waiting for Godot?

3 Answers | Add Yours

user profile pic

Ashley Kannan | Middle School Teacher | (Level 3) Distinguished Educator

Posted February 5, 2010 at 9:16 PM (Answer #2)

dislike 3 like

This is probably the most essential question that drives the inquiry behind Beckett's work. On one level, I think that it is a misread to consider "Godot" as "God."  It seems that it is to quick and reductive of an answer given the complexity of Beckett's work.  However, there is a level of truth which might be there in such an answer.  The idea of a totalizing, unifying, and transcendent force causes people to "wait" for an answer, to "wait" for the belief in resolution within such comedic realities.  Recall Yeats' poem, "The Second Coming:"  "Surely, the second coming is at hand."  This idea that the craving for unity and symmetry causes individuals to wait for something, causing paralysis, as opposed to taking action to minimize human suffering and cruelty might be a significant aspect of determining "who is Godot."  Anything that causes individuals to wait and not take action can serve as Godot.

user profile pic

lynnebh | High School Teacher | (Level 3) Senior Educator

Posted February 4, 2010 at 11:02 PM (Answer #1)

dislike 2 like

This is a much harder question to answer than it might appear. In this play, which is an example of "theatre of the absurd", there is much discussion regarding who Godot is really supposed to be.

On the surface, he is a person for whom the characters are waiting, but who never arrives. Some critics of the play have speculated that Becket was playing with the idea of God, and they point to the similarity of the name "Godot" with "God". Man is always searching for God, but he never comes. Or, man is always waiting for someone to make his life better, but this never happens, that "person" never comes.

At the end of the play, Vladimir and Estragon decide to leave, to stop waiting for Godot, but do they go? No. They stay. Nothing happens. It's absurd - theatre of the absurd. Life is absurd. God is existential. If he's there, he doesn't care. And men waste a lot of time in life trying to figure out if he is coming. But he never does. It's up to us to figure out our reason for existence, and if there is a God, he watches with disinterest. Pretty grim philosophy, in my view.

Read the info here on enotes and see what kind of an interpretation YOU can come up with.

user profile pic

kitir | eNotes Newbie

Posted May 4, 2015 at 2:39 PM (Answer #3)

dislike 0 like

Godot refers to may God as the absurd literary trend emerged in very crucial conditions of suffering ,agony and frustration due to war with tragic reality on the life . rendering impossible to sort out of recurrent vicious circle of death and dismay that hindered human mind stagnate , unable to determine his destiny for redemption, but attached his hopes on god for salvation instead making g his mind to draw his own fate  this is the absurdity   

Join to answer this question

Join a community of thousands of dedicated teachers and students.

Join eNotes