1 Answer | Add Yours
Because Max Brooks writes World War Z: An Oral History of the Zombie War in anecdotal form (which means as a collection of stories), it is difficult to say that one person is the protagonist. Brooks seems to be the central figure—the cohesion—in the story: the person that holds the "report" together: he is the one constant. He might be considered the protagonist because he is continually present in the novel except for the definition below.
Dr. L. Kip Wheeler defines a protagonist as:
the main character in a work, on whom the author focuses most of the narrative attention
Brooks' accounts are based on interviews that he has conducted that describe the spread of the zombie infestation throughout the world. I do not believe that the "narrative attention" focuses on Brooks as much as on those telling their stories in the interviews. In this case, each story, or section, has a different protagonist.
Much like Chaucer in The Canterbury Tales, while he includes himself as a member of the pilgrimage described in the Prologue, Chaucer provides the structural framework (through the use of the pilgrimage) to bring a wide and diverse group of people together. In this way, Brooks uses the structure of the interviews to collect a wide variety of stories about World War Z. In my opinion, Brooks is not the protagonist, but each interview or story has its own.
We’ve answered 301,026 questions. We can answer yours, too.Ask a question