1 Answer | Add Yours
What the Court decided in this case is that a hospital that is run by the state violates the 4th Amendment when it routinely screens all pregnant women, without their consent, for drug use. The hospital did this as a way of trying to prevent pregnant women from harming their unborn children through drug use. The Court ruled that such an action by a state employee constitutes a search under the 4th Amendment and therefore cannot be done without consent. This was especially true because the hospital collaborated with the police and prosecutors in setting up their system.
We’ve answered 317,286 questions. We can answer yours, too.Ask a question