Better Students Ask More Questions.
What does William Shakespeare mean in the sonnet, "Let me not to the marriage of true...
4 Answers | add yours
The principal theme of Sonnet 116 is that love is constant despite the corrosive power of Time and chance. The sentiment expressed here was familiar to Shakespeare's readers and to us from the customary marriage ceremony.
At the start of the sonnet's third quatrain, the narrator asserts even though Time inevitably exacts its toll on physical beauty and leads to the "doom" of mortality, true love remains. "Love's not Time's fool" captures the gist of the sonnet as a whole.
The ending couplet, though, injects a false note into the text. The narrator challenges others to the impossible task of disproving his argument that true love is constant and then uses both his own verse and the existence of love at-large as his proof.
Posted by brandih on February 3, 2007 at 7:29 AM (Answer #1)
High School Teacher
"Let me not to the marriage of true minds/ admit impediments"
The phrase "true minds" suggests an elevated rather than physical love. With a love of this kind, no obstacles should interfere. A marriage of true minds should withstand any storm, including the ravages of time. This type of love is unchanging, an "ever fixed mark". Unlike other loves that could be tossed about by tempests and destroyed, this love is solid, like the star that guides the lost at sea (every wandering bark). Because it is not a lust or a body driven love, the usual mortal complaints don't apply. Time may ravage the body, affecting such external qualities like the rosiness of lips and cheeks, but a marriage between true minds--that is true, exalted love--will continue despite the ravages of time. And this is what it means to love.
Posted by blacksheepunite on May 26, 2007 at 11:47 AM (Answer #2)
love is the commitment of two true minds based on understanding and trust. such love which changes when obstacles, people, aspects and such things which try to change or remove love, is not genuine. it will be present with the same intensity and emotion no matter what comes its way. love is constant and will always be there, even when things overshadow it. it guides people to the right way towards it and many people experience it, and use it, but dont know its real value/height. people dont value love. love is not something that changes as years pass by, but physical attraction/beauty, can change and falter/die out through time. as time goes by, one cannot retain youthful beauty, but since genuine love goes beyong looks, it will always remain there. love is also present with the same emotion even after death/till the day of judgement. if shakespeares version of love is incorrect, then he swears to have never written anything worthy, and nor can any man claim to hav ever fallen in love
Posted by sgoawala on November 10, 2008 at 12:21 AM (Answer #3)
It is trying to tell you that even though this person may be attractive, you may not love her as much. Love is a strong element of fate and desire and emotional love would never change. You may even love the person you regard as an enemy. He is trying to say that love would endure forever. Shakespeare is trying to compare love to a marriage- a life-long commitment that people have to make to consider really true love. If your love to each other is complete, it would have conquered time and bend changes as your love for each other would never die down and it would be everlasting. If your love for each other is strong, it would defeat time, day and even death itself.
Posted by revolution on August 31, 2009 at 6:09 PM (Answer #4)
Related QuestionsSee all »
Join to answer this question
Join a community of thousands of dedicated teachers and students.