Better Students Ask More Questions.
When reading Joseph Conrad's Heart of Darkness, how might the term "efficiency" be...
1 Answer | add yours
- He seems to distinguish between mere conquerors and true colonists (or colonialists). Conquerors use brute force to subjugate other peoples so that they may essentially steal from them. Colonialists, on the other hand, plan to settle in a foreign country for an extended period of time and plan to exploit its resources for the foreseeable future. In order to be effective at such exploitation, they must be efficient. They must establish smoothly functioning systems that allow them to use the colonized land and people to maximum advantage. They don’t intend simply to steal and then leave in a few years; they intend to establish a long-lasting colonial enterprise that will repay handsome, dependable, and continuing returns on any investment.
- “Efficiency” implies planning, forethought, and intelligence. It is not merely the taking of a quick, momentary advantage of an opportunity that just happens to present itself. Instead, it suggests the use of the power that is necessary to accomplish a preconceived task. By the time Conrad was writing, “efficiency” was a word that had come to be often associated with industrial production and business acumen. It implied effectively using tools (literal or metaphorical) as means to an end, even if those tools happened to be human. It implied (and still implies) energy, commitment, and the ability to achieve the most output for the least amount of effort. All these connotations, of course, are highly relevant to colonialism.
- “Efficiency” in this context also implies the setting up of actual established colonies, not mere temporary outposts. Colonies would lure colonists eager to profit and perhaps even settle. Efficiency would make a colony the kind of place where one might want to settle for an extended period of time.
Very early in the first chapter of Joseph Conrad’s novel The Heart of Darkness, Marlow, the character who narrates much of the book, discusses the fact that Britain itself was once an uncivilized, savage land. He imagines the Roman conquerors who invaded Britain, and in particular he imagines the reactions of some of the rather ordinary Romans who must have come to Britain after it had been conquered. They weren’t professional soldiers; they were citizens visiting the very outskirts of the Roman empire. These were people (he says to his comrades) who had to encounter metaphorical darkness and who would have felt the
“fascination of the abomination--you know. Imagine the growing regrets [they must have felt], the longing to escape, the powerless disgust, the surrender, the hate."
“Mind,” he continues (meaning “mind you” or “I readily admit”),
“none of us would feel exactly like this. What saves us is efficiency--the devotion to efficiency. But these chaps were not much account, really. They were no colonists; their administration was merely a squeeze, and nothing more, I suspect. They were conquerors, and for that you want only brute force . . . .”
This is a crucial passage. Indeed, only one other explicit reference to efficiency appears in the entire novel – a fact that gives the passage just quoted special weight.
What, then, does Marlow mean by “efficiency,” especially in the context of colonialism? Here are some possibilities:
Posted by vangoghfan on September 23, 2011 at 12:27 PM (Answer #1)
Related QuestionsSee all »
Join to answer this question
Join a community of thousands of dedicated teachers and students.